[U-Boot] [PATCH v6 0/5] add i.MX6 thermal sensor driver

[Nitin Garg]

On 11/15/2014 06:34 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hello nitin.garg at freescale.com,
> 
> On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 14:13:02 -0600, nitin.garg at freescale.com
> <nitin.garg at freescale.com> wrote:
>> From: Nitin Garg <nitin.garg at freescale.com>
>>
>> This patch set adds i.MX6 thermal sensor driver
>> and enables it for mx6sabre boards. Also adds
>> various anadig bit definitions as required for
>> upcoming drivers.
>>
>> Changes in v6:
>> -Aligned imx thermal driver macro defines with kernel
>>
>> Changes in v5:
>> -Don't modify the copyright of cpu.c and crm_regs.h file
>>
>> Changes in v4:
>> -Added imx6 thermal sensor as a driver
>> -Renamed the config define to be more meaningful
>> -Move the clock code to clock.c
>> -Reusing ocotp driver for reading fuse
>> -Fix check for calibration fuse not programmed
>> -Aligned the slope computation with kernel
>> -Added Anadig register defines as seperate commit
>>
>> Changes in v3:
>> -adds the mx6 thermal driver support
>> -adds the mx6 thermal support to mx6sabresd board.
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> -run checkpatch and fix reported issues
>>
>> Nitin Garg (4):
>>   mx6: clock: Add api to enable pll3
>>   mx6: thermal: Add i.MX6 CPU thermal sensor support
>>   mx6: thermal: Check cpu temperature via thermal sensor
>>   mx6: thermal: Enable thermal sensor for mx6 sabre boards.
> 
> So, is it 5 as the cover letter says, or 4 as the patches say? If
> actually 4 and only the cover letter is wrong, then there's no need to
> repost. If actually 5, then please repost them all, renumbered
> accordingly.
> 
> Amicalement,
> 

Just the cover subject is wrong (0/5 should be 0/4). Thanks,