[U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-x86.git

[Simon Glass]

Hi Masahiro,

On 21 November 2014 09:29, Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m at jp.panasonic.com> wrote:
> Hi Simon, Tom,
>
>
>
> On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 08:24:54 +0100
> Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Masahiro,
>>
>> On 21 November 2014 08:11, Masahiro Yamada <yamada.m at jp.panasonic.com> wrote:
>> > Simon,
>> >
>> > On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 08:00:27 +0100
>> > Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi Tom,
>> >>
>> >> Here's the introduction of bare x86 support.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> The following changes since commit 4d70b34d7f721d8b1d4d628e68c3a44ab7a10dff:
>> >>
>> >>   Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-ubi (2014-11-19
>> >> 23:18:29 -0500)
>> >>
>> >> are available in the git repository at:
>> >>
>> >>   git://git.denx.de/u-boot-x86.git
>> >>
>> >> for you to fetch changes up to fe5b9b447c6eea3873833b1f3ba15c9854aa2ef8:
>> >>
>> >>   x86: Rename chromebook-x86 to coreboot (2014-11-21 07:34:16 +0100)
>> >>
>> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> Bin Meng (4):
>> >>       x86: Do CPU identification in the early phase
>> >>       x86: Do TSC MSR calibration only for known/supported CPUs
>> >>       x86: Add quick TSC calibration via PIT
>> >>       x86: Save TSC frequency in the global data
>> >>
>> >> Masahiro Yamada (1):
>> >>       x86: use CONFIG_SYS_COREBOOT to descend into coreboot/ directory
>> >
>> >
>> > Wait, this patch was posted as a series.
>> >
>> > It should not be applied without the others in my series.
>> > What is going on?
>>
>> I applied this to x86 a while back - it actually was the same as a
>> patch I had locally so I picked up yours instead. It works fine on x86
>> and I think it is independent of the series.
>>
>> So I know this is a bit unusual but I think it is OK.
>
>
> Understood, but I am a bit unhappy because
>   - The subject "x86: use CONFIG_SYS_COREBOOT to descend into coreboot/ directory"
>     is totally unrelated to the actual code
>   - The first hunk was lost of my original patch, so I have to resend my series
>     to get it back.
>
>
> Tom, if possible, after you pull this, can you rephrase the commit subject locally?
> For ex.
>
>    "x86: use CONFIG_SYS_COREBOOT to descend into coreboot/ directory"
>
>    ->
>
>     "x86: remove redundant CONFIG_SYS_COREBOOT references"
>
>
>
> I will resend my series lator...

Ah sorry, I'm not sure what went wrong but it looks like I dropped a piece.

Tom, if you haven't already applied it, I'll drop this patch and
resend the pull request next week.

Regards,
Simon