[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/5] mx6: crm_regs: Add bit definitions for anadig registers

[Nitin Garg]

Hi Stefano,
On 10/01/2014 02:21 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> Hi Nitin, Tom, Wolfgang,
> 
> On 16/09/2014 18:48, Nitin Garg wrote:
>> Add bit definitons for various anadig registers as
>> required by various drivers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nitin Garg <nitin.garg at freescale.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v4: None
>> Changes in v3: None
>> Changes in v2: None
>>
>>  arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/crm_regs.h |  543 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 542 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/crm_regs.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/crm_regs.h
>> index e67b5b9..66a7cea 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/crm_regs.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/crm_regs.h
>> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
>>  /*
>> - * Copyright 2011 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
>> + * Copyright 2011-2014 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
> 
> This is a legal issue. I guess some changes like this one have already
> flown into mainline, but I am quite unsure that this is legally correct.
> Originally, when the file was introduced, it had Freescale's Copyright -
> fine.
> 
> Of course, this header file was changed several times, and not only by
> Freescale or Freescale's employers. Is it then correct to update the
> copyright now, extending the datum ? I doubt this is ok.
> 
> Thanks for clarification,
> Stefano Babic
> 

Shall I remove it and resend? Or shall I change it to 2011,2014?
Pls suggest.

Regards,
Nitin