[U-Boot] Discussion topics / issues

[Tom Rini]

On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 12:11:54AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > I don't this Albert is the problem, I am starting to suspect we simply lack
> > custodian manpower in general. And I also suspect we're not quite inviting
> > and attractive crowd, which is something we should discuss too ...
> 
> As I said privately, I believe we have way too many custodians...

I think perhaps I need to better spell out custodian expectations.  But
as to having too many?  No, I need some convincing in that direction.

> Anyway, u-boot code looks similar to kernel code, but patch submission
> rules are really different.
> 
> Something like this could help..?
> 									Pavel
> 
> --- /dev/null	2014-10-09 01:15:57.354292026 +0200
> +++ doc/SubmittingPatches	2014-10-09 23:58:53.058883776 +0200
> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> +Differences from kernel:

Perhaps.  If not in tree, a concice reminder to follow all of the rules
spelled out on the wiki to avoid the ping-ponging you noted in a follow
up later.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20141009/62d82fd3/attachment.pgp>