[U-Boot] [PATCH] imx: mx6 sabreauto: Add board support for USB EHCI

Li Ye-B37916 b37916 at freescale.com
Mon Oct 13 07:56:31 CEST 2014


On 10/10/2014 7:46 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 6:01 AM, Ye.Li <B37916 at freescale.com> wrote:
>> On mx6 sabreauto board, there are two USB ports:
>> 0: OTG
>> 1: HOST
>> The EHCI driver is enabled for this board, but the IOMUX and VBUS power
>> control is not implemented, which cause both USB port failed to work.
>> This patch fix the problem by adding the BSP support.
> BSP is a broad term here.
>
>> Since the power control uses the GPIO pin from port expander MAX7310,
>> the PCA953X driver is enabled for accessing the MAX7310.
>>
>> The ID pin of OTG Port needs to configure the GPR1 bit 13 for selecting
>> its daisy chain. Add a new function "imx_iomux_set_gpr_register" to
>> handle GPR register setting.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ye.Li <B37916 at freescale.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/imx-common/iomux-v3.c                |   17 +++++-
>>  arch/arm/include/asm/imx-common/iomux-v3.h    |    7 ++-
>>  board/freescale/mx6qsabreauto/mx6qsabreauto.c |   89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  include/configs/mx6qsabreauto.h               |    5 +-
>>  4 files changed, 114 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/imx-common/iomux-v3.c b/arch/arm/imx-common/iomux-v3.c
>> index 22cd11a..2d96655 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/imx-common/iomux-v3.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/imx-common/iomux-v3.c
>> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
>>   * Copyright (C) 2009 by Jan Weitzel Phytec Messtechnik GmbH,
>>   *                       <armlinux at phytec.de>
>>   *
>> - * Copyright (C) 2004-2011 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
>> + * Copyright (C) 2004-2014 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
> I don't see the need for changing the copyright everytime you touch a
> file. Same apply to other files in this patch.
>
>> +static int port_exp_direction_output(unsigned gpio, int value)
>> +{
>> +       int ret;
>> +
>> +       i2c_set_bus_num(2);
>> +       if (i2c_probe(PORTEXP_IO_TO_CHIP(gpio)))
>> +               return -ENXIO;
> Would be better like this:
>
> ret = i2c_probe(PORTEXP_IO_TO_CHIP(gpio))
> if (ret)
>     return ret;
>
>> +
>> +       ret = pca953x_set_dir(PORTEXP_IO_TO_CHIP(gpio),
>> +               (1 << PORTEXP_IO_TO_PIN(gpio)),
>> +               (PCA953X_DIR_OUT << PORTEXP_IO_TO_PIN(gpio)));
> Here you can do:
>
> if (ret)
>   return ret;
>
>> +
>> +       if (!ret)
> Then you don't need to check for !ret here
>
>> +               ret = pca953x_set_val(PORTEXP_IO_TO_CHIP(gpio),
>> +                       (1 << PORTEXP_IO_TO_PIN(gpio)),
>> +                       (value << PORTEXP_IO_TO_PIN(gpio)));
>> +
>> +       if (ret)
>> +               ret = -EIO;
>> +
>> +       return ret;
>> +}
> if (ret)
>    return ret;
>
> return 0;
>
>> +int board_ehci_hcd_init(int port)
>> +{
>> +       switch (port) {
>> +       case 0:
>> +               imx_iomux_v3_setup_multiple_pads(usb_otg_pads,
>> +                       ARRAY_SIZE(usb_otg_pads));
>> +
>> +               /*set daisy chain for otg_pin_id on 6q. for 6dl, this bit is reserved*/
>> +               imx_iomux_set_gpr_register(1, 13, 1, 0);
>> +               break;
>> +       case 1:
>> +               break;
>> +       default:
>> +               printf("MXC USB port %d not yet supported\n", port);
>> +               return 1;
> return -EINVAL;
>
>> +int board_ehci_power(int port, int on)
>> +{
>> +       switch (port) {
>> +       case 0:
>> +               if (on)
>> +                       port_exp_direction_output(USB_OTG_PWR, 1);
>> +               else
>> +                       port_exp_direction_output(USB_OTG_PWR, 0);
>> +               break;
>> +       case 1:
>> +               if (on)
>> +                       port_exp_direction_output(USB_HOST1_PWR, 1);
>> +               else
>> +                       port_exp_direction_output(USB_HOST1_PWR, 0);
>> +               break;
>> +       default:
>> +               printf("MXC USB port %d not yet supported\n", port);
>> +               return 1;
> return -EINVAL;

I will update per your comments.

For the copyright, in FSL we are asked to update it when applying any change to the file. what's the rule used in community?

Best regards,
Ye Li


More information about the U-Boot mailing list