[U-Boot] [PATCH v9 12/12] dm: exynos: gpio: Convert to driver model

[Przemyslaw Marczak]

Hello again,

On 10/20/2014 05:53 PM, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 10/20/2014 05:31 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 20 October 2014 08:55, Przemyslaw Marczak <p.marczak at samsung.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Hello Simon,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/15/2014 10:38 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Convert the exynos GPIO driver to driver model. This implements the
>>>> generic
>>>> GPIO interface but not the extra Exynos-specific functions.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Changes in v9:
>>>> - Add missing compatible strings from exynos_gpio_ids[]
>>>>
>>>> Changes in v8:
>>>> - Enable driver model for smdkc100 and s5p_goni separately
>>>>
>>>> Changes in v7:
>>>> - Bring in patches from the SPI series to move post-reloc DM init
>>>> earlier
>>>>
>>>> Changes in v6: None
>>>> Changes in v5:
>>>> - Remove RFC label now that build errors are fixed
>>>> - Tidy up and update cover letter message
>>>> - Avoid reordering functions
>>>>
>>>> Changes in v4:
>>>> - Add patches for exynos GPIO support
>>>>
>>>>    drivers/gpio/s5p_gpio.c         | 424
>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>>>>    include/configs/exynos-common.h |   4 +
>>>>    include/configs/s5p_goni.h      |   3 +
>>>>    include/configs/smdkc100.h      |   3 +
>>>>    4 files changed, 298 insertions(+), 136 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/s5p_gpio.c b/drivers/gpio/s5p_gpio.c
>>>> index 99f2dd8..13d74eb 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpio/s5p_gpio.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/s5p_gpio.c
>>>> @@ -6,8 +6,15 @@
>>>>     */
>>>>
>>>
>>> ..snip..
>>>
>>>> +/**
>>>> + * We have a top-level GPIO device with no actual GPIOs. It has a
>>>> child
>>>> + * device for each Exynos GPIO bank.
>>>> + */
>>>> +static int gpio_exynos_bind(struct udevice *parent)
>>>> +{
>>>> +       struct exynos_gpio_platdata *plat = parent->platdata;
>>>> +       struct s5p_gpio_bank *bank, *base;
>>>> +       const void *blob = gd->fdt_blob;
>>>> +       int node;
>>>> +
>>>> +       /* If this is a child device, there is nothing to do here */
>>>> +       if (plat)
>>>> +               return 0;
>>>> +
>>>> +       base = (struct s5p_gpio_bank *)fdtdec_get_addr(gd->fdt_blob,
>>>> +                                                  parent->of_offset,
>>>> "reg");
>>>> +       for (node = fdt_first_subnode(blob, parent->of_offset), bank =
>>>> base;
>>>> +            node > 0;
>>>> +            node = fdt_next_subnode(blob, node), bank++) {
>>>
>>>
>>> Here (bank++) you assume, that order of subnodes of each pinctrl is
>>> the same
>>> like in dts file - as I wrote in comment to patch 04 - it isn't.
>>>
>>>> +               struct exynos_gpio_platdata *plat;
>>>> +               struct udevice *dev;
>>>> +               fdt_addr_t reg;
>>>> +               int ret;
>>>> +
>>>> +               if (!fdtdec_get_bool(blob, node, "gpio-controller"))
>>>> +                       continue;
>>>> +               plat = calloc(1, sizeof(*plat));
>>>> +               if (!plat)
>>>> +                       return -ENOMEM;
>>>
>>>
>>> Some parts of GPIO banks, for which "reg" can be found are prober.
>>>
>>>
>>>> +               reg = fdtdec_get_addr(blob, node, "reg");
>>>> +               if (reg != FDT_ADDR_T_NONE)
>>>> +                       bank = (struct s5p_gpio_bank *)((ulong)base +
>>>> reg);
>>>> +               plat->bank = bank;
>>>> +               plat->bank_name = fdt_get_name(blob, node, NULL);
>>>> +               debug("dev at %p: %s\n", bank, plat->bank_name);
>>>> +
>>>> +               ret = device_bind(parent, parent->driver,
>>>> +                                       plat->bank_name, plat, -1,
>>>> &dev);
>>>> +               if (ret)
>>>> +                       return ret;
>>>> +               dev->of_offset = parent->of_offset;
>>>> +       }
>>>> +
>>>> +       return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static const struct udevice_id exynos_gpio_ids[] = {
>>>> +       { .compatible = "samsung,s5pc100-pinctrl" },
>>>> +       { .compatible = "samsung,s5pc110-pinctrl" },
>>>> +       { .compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pinctrl" },
>>>> +       { .compatible = "samsung,exynos4x12-pinctrl" },
>>>> +       { .compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-pinctrl" },
>>>> +       { .compatible = "samsung,exynos5420-pinctrl" },
>>>> +       { }
>>>
>>>
>>> ... snip ...
>>>
>>> And this is not the end of issues:)
>>>
>>> Unfortunately Exynos4xxx has a gaps in GPIO bank address space, and
>>> the big
>>> gpio enum lists includes that here:
>>> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/gpio.h
>>>
>>> This works for Exynos5, because it's enum list is linear.
>>>
>>> And the driver gpio-uclass.c - assumes that the gpio numbers are linear.
>>> When I removed the gaps in enum for 4x12 -then gpio is mapped good.
>>>
>>> And after remove the enum gaps, it also requires fitting the gpios in
>>> dts
>>> files, e.g. cd-gpio, pwr-gpios for sdhci host.
>>>
>>> Sorry for such late reply in v9 but, before it seems working fine - I
>>> didn't
>>> try to check the sd card before.
>>>
>>> I hope that after that fixes, everything will work fine:)
>>
>> Thanks very much for testing this. As mentioned on the other patch,
>> please try u-boot-dm/next and see how things look.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Simon
>>
>
> No problem, it's also important for me. I will check the "next" in a few
> minutes.
>
> Regards,

After a quick look into the code I suppose that the issues are not 
fixed, but it is tested for sure:)

So the main required changes:
1. Remove/fix all "**pinctrl-uboot.dtsi" files and move the cells size 
into "pinctrl.dtsi"

2. Remove the gaps in Exynos4xxx gpio enum:
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/gpio.

and now I checked that the same is for s5pc110, here:
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-s5pc1xx/gpio.h (only S5PC110_GPIO_H00)

3. Fix exynos4xxx boards *.dts after remove the gaps in gpio enum.

So I think, this is all.

Best Regards,
-- 
Przemyslaw Marczak
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
p.marczak at samsung.com