[U-Boot] [PATCH] tools/kwbimage: Fix compilation warning
Wolfgang Denk
wd at denx.de
Mon Oct 27 13:57:43 CET 2014
Dear Stefan,
In message <1414412953-25615-1-git-send-email-sr at denx.de> you wrote:
> This patch fixes a compilation warning of kwbimage.c:
>
> tools/kwbimage.c: In function ‘kwbimage_set_header’:
> tools/kwbimage.c:784:8: warning: ‘headersz’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> memcpy(ptr, image, headersz);
> ^
> Instead of using multiple if statements, use a switch statement with
> a default entry. And return with error if the VERSION field is
> missing in the cfg file.
Thanks, but...
> + switch (version) {
> + /*
> + * Fallback to version 0 is no version is provided in the
> + * cfg file
> + */
> + case -1:
> + case 0:
> image = image_create_v0(&headersz, params, sbuf->st_size);
> + break;
> +
> + case 1:
> image = image_create_v1(&headersz, params, sbuf->st_size);
> + break;
> +
> + default:
> + fprintf(stderr, "File %s does not have the VERSION field\n",
> + params->imagename);
> + free(image_cfg);
> + exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> + }
What exactly is the difference between return code -1 (no version is
provided and you fall back to using version 0), and the default case?
To me these look the same?
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
Wenn Du ein' weise Antwort verlangst, Mußt Du vernünftig fragen.
-- Goethe, Invektiven
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list