[U-Boot] u-boot, fsl_espi.c driver
Mingkai.Hu at freescale.com
Mingkai.Hu at freescale.com
Tue Oct 28 12:17:24 CET 2014
Hi Joakim and York,
I apologize for the delayed response and thanks for your catch up, Joakim
In order to get a higher transfer speed, the eSPI controller was designed to transfer multiple bytes at one transaction which is not comply with the SPI framework and the CS can't be inactive until one transfer finished, so we need to combine the multiple transfers into one transfer, that's the reason why there are more memory copy back and forth.
The driver has been tested on SPI flash and the transfer length larger than max_trans_len should be handled but half-duplex was not handled. Is it possible to provide patch to make it workable for different devices?
0x0b is the FAST READ command. The logic here is to move the pointer of receive buffer to receive new data when reading from NOR flash and the reading length is larger than the max_trans_len.
Thanks,
Mingkai
________________________________________
From: Sun York-R58495
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 6:14 AM
To: jagan Teki; Hu Mingkai-B21284
Cc: Joakim Tjernlund; Hou Zhiqiang-B48286; u-boot at lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: u-boot, fsl_espi.c driver
Jagan and Mingkai,
Would you take a look when you have a chance?
York
On 10/22/2014 03:12 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> York Sun <yorksun at freescale.com> wrote on 2014/10/09 20:06:31:
>>
>> Dear Joakim,
>>
>> On 10/09/2014 10:43 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>>> York Sun <yorksun at freescale.com> wrote on 2014/10/09 18:25:40:
>>>>
>>>> Dear Joakim,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for raising a concern.
>>>>
>>>> It's not fair to blame the last person who submitted a patch. We are
> all
>>> working
>>>
>>> No of course not, I just noticed you guys had been in there and
> patched up
>>> some problem
>>> so I hoped you would be interested to fix the remaining problems. This
>
>>> driver should never
>>> have been committed in the first place.
>>>
>>>> to make it better as an opensource comminuty. You have done a good
> job
>>> to hack
>>>> it to work. Would it be nicer if you can submit this or improved
> patch
>>> to u-boot
>>>> community for further review and testing, after putting informing
> commit
>>>> message? The mailing list address is CC'ed.
>>>
>>> Main problem with this driver is that TX does not work for:
>>> len > max_tran_len (nor does RX)
>>> does not TX the last odd bytes(len % 4 != 0)
>>> Does not work with TX only(RX buf == NULL)
>>>
>>> Silently ignores SPI_LSB_FIRST
>>>
>>> On top of that it uses malloc all over and copies data back and forth
> for
>>> no good
>>> reason, image a big SPI transfer with many MB(like my FPGA load).
>>>
>>> I am not in a good position fix this properly as my FPGA is TX only so
> I
>>> cannot test
>>> RX at all(which is broken by my hack)
>>>
>>> Finally, just to illustrate the merits of this driver, after
> transmission
>>> is done
>>> there is:
>>> if (*buffer == 0x0b) {
>>> data_in += tran_len;
>>> data_len -= tran_len;
>>> *(int *)buffer += tran_len;
>>> }
>>> what is the magic 0x0b test all about?
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for the report. Driver maintainer (CC'ed) will take a look.
>>
>> York
>
> No reaction from maintainers, I don't think this driver is still
> maintained.
>
> Jocke
>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list