[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/8] samsung: Use common config files with Samsung boards (help wanted)
Przemyslaw Marczak
p.marczak at samsung.com
Fri Sep 12 10:39:23 CEST 2014
Hello Simon,
On 09/09/2014 12:31 PM, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I will test this patch set on a trats2 board - today evening.
>
> On 09/09/2014 08:05 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Minkyu,
>>
>> On 25 July 2014 08:43, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Lucasz,
>>>
>>> On 24 July 2014 09:34, Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski at samsung.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi Simon,
>>>>
>>>>> This series tries to unify the Samsung board configs into a few header
>>>>> files for exynos5 and exynos5.
>>>>>
>>>>> The purpose is to make it easier to move to driver model. In that case
>>>>> I would like things like the GPIO drivers and serial drivers to work
>>>>> in a standard way, and not need to support device tree and platform
>>>>> data at the same time. That would be quite painful.
>>>>>
>>>>> Another reason is that the Chrome OS EC drivers are currently
>>>>> included in boards that don't have a Chrome OS EC. This concern was
>>>>> raised by the Samsung maintainer (Minkyu) a while back.
>>>>>
>>>>> There are still a few boards that don't use CONFIG_OF_CONTROL so I
>>>>> have updated these with the most rudimentary of device tree files.
>>>>>
>>>>> Unfortunately I don't have boards for most of these (for testing) and
>>>>> I am hoping that the maintainers can come to the rescue and fix up any
>>>>> patches that have problems. I am also worried that I have used a
>>>>> common exynos file for things like smdkv310, when in fact they have
>>>>> some other chip in common.
>>>>>
>>>>> So maintainers, please can you test this and re-issue the patch, or
>>>>> make comments on my attempts?
>>>>
>>>> We will do our best to test our Exynos4 based boards.
>>>
>>> Thanks - please feel free to re-issue the patches and I will drop mine
>>> (if you cc me).
>>>
>>
>> Can you please review this series? We are already at rc2.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Simon
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> U-Boot mailing list
>> U-Boot at lists.denx.de
>> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
>>
>
> Best regards,
It works fine on trats2.
I'm currently working on PMIC framework at the top of your
u-boot-dm/working branch and it also works fine on Trats2.
Best regards
--
Przemyslaw Marczak
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
p.marczak at samsung.com
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list