[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/8] samsung: Use common config files with Samsung boards (help wanted)

Simon Glass sjg at chromium.org
Fri Sep 12 16:48:59 CEST 2014


Hi Przemyslaw,

On 12 September 2014 02:39, Przemyslaw Marczak <p.marczak at samsung.com> wrote:
>
> Hello Simon,
>
>
> On 09/09/2014 12:31 PM, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I will test this patch set on a trats2 board - today evening.
>>
>> On 09/09/2014 08:05 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Minkyu,
>>>
>>> On 25 July 2014 08:43, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Lucasz,
>>>>
>>>> On 24 July 2014 09:34, Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski at samsung.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Simon,
>>>>>
>>>>>> This series tries to unify the Samsung board configs into a few header
>>>>>> files for exynos5 and exynos5.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The purpose is to make it easier to move to driver model. In that case
>>>>>> I would like things like the GPIO drivers and serial drivers to work
>>>>>> in a standard way, and not need to support device tree and platform
>>>>>> data at the same time. That would be quite painful.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Another reason is that the Chrome OS EC drivers are currently
>>>>>> included in boards that don't have a Chrome OS EC. This concern was
>>>>>> raised by the Samsung maintainer (Minkyu) a while back.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There are still a few boards that don't use CONFIG_OF_CONTROL so I
>>>>>> have updated these with the most rudimentary of device tree files.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Unfortunately I don't have boards for most of these (for testing) and
>>>>>> I am hoping that the maintainers can come to the rescue and fix up any
>>>>>> patches that have problems. I am also worried that I have used a
>>>>>> common exynos file for things like smdkv310, when in fact they have
>>>>>> some other chip in common.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So maintainers, please can you test this and re-issue the patch, or
>>>>>> make comments on my attempts?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> We will do our best to test our Exynos4 based boards.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks - please feel free to re-issue the patches and I will drop mine
>>>> (if you cc me).
>>>>
>>>
>>> Can you please review this series? We are already at rc2.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Simon
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> U-Boot mailing list
>>> U-Boot at lists.denx.de
>>> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
>>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>
>
> It works fine on trats2.
> I'm currently working on PMIC framework at the top of your u-boot-dm/working branch and it also works fine on Trats2.

OK good, thanks for testing. I'll go through the feedback and see if I
can give the patches another spin. It would be great if we can get
exynos DM support in mainline for the upcoming release.

Regards,
Simon


More information about the U-Boot mailing list