[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 08/11] dm: imx: Use gpio_request() to request GPIOs

Simon Glass sjg at chromium.org
Wed Sep 17 16:34:34 CEST 2014


Hi Igor,

On 17 September 2014 08:31, Igor Grinberg <grinberg at compulab.co.il> wrote:

> On 09/17/14 17:00, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Igor,
> >
> > On 17 September 2014 06:13, Igor Grinberg <grinberg at compulab.co.il
> <mailto:grinberg at compulab.co.il>> wrote:
> >
> >     Hi Simon,
> >
> >     On 09/17/14 06:51, Simon Glass wrote:
> >     > GPIOs should be requested before use. Without this, driver model
> will not
> >     > permit the GPIO to be used.
> >     >
> >     > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org <mailto:
> sjg at chromium.org>>
> >     > ---
> >     >
> >     > Changes in v2:
> >     > - Check return values of gpio_request()
> >     >
> >     >  arch/arm/imx-common/i2c-mxv7.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >     >  board/compulab/cm_fx6/cm_fx6.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> >     >  board/compulab/cm_fx6/common.c |  7 +++++++
> >     >  3 files changed, 46 insertions(+)
> >     >
>
> [...]
>
> >     > diff --git a/board/compulab/cm_fx6/common.c
> b/board/compulab/cm_fx6/common.c
> >     > index 1f39679..e4d7e2e 100644
> >     > --- a/board/compulab/cm_fx6/common.c
> >     > +++ b/board/compulab/cm_fx6/common.c
> >     > @@ -79,6 +79,13 @@ void cm_fx6_set_ecspi_iomux(void)
> >     >
> >     >  int board_spi_cs_gpio(unsigned bus, unsigned cs)
> >     >  {
> >     > +#ifndef CONFIG_SPL_BUILD
> >     > +     int ret;
> >     > +
> >     > +     ret = gpio_request(CM_FX6_ECSPI_BUS0_CS0, "ecspi_bus0_cs0");
> >     > +     if (ret)
> >     > +             return ret;
> >     > +#endif
> >
> >     Is there a reason for excluding this request from spl builds?
> >     We do build with CONFIG_SPL_GPIO_SUPPORT and we don't have a
> >     problem with spl size.
> >     So, if there is no strong reason to exclude it from spl build,
> >     I'd like to remove the #ifndef.
> >
> >
> > It isn't supported by DM yet.
>
> AFAICS, gpio_request() is available for SPL.
> So in such case the non-DM version will be used and
> I can't see any problem with this (unless it does not work for some
> reason).
>

I suggest that if you wanted the gpio_request() in the non-DM case you
would already have added it?

I would prefer not to have an #ifdef CONFIG_DM_GPIO here also. Can we
revisit when DM supports SPL?

Regards,
Simon


More information about the U-Boot mailing list