[U-Boot] [PATCH] imx: mx6 move TARGET_xx Kconfig option to mx6 specific Kconfig file

[Masahiro Yamada]

2015-08-07 19:02 GMT+09:00 Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de>:
> On Friday, August 07, 2015 at 09:33:02 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
>> Hi Peng, Soeren,
>
> Hi,
>
>> On 07/08/2015 09:19, Soeren Moch wrote:
>> > Peng,
>> >
>> > Sorry for being unclear here.
>> >
>> > In your patch you add several options in arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx6/Kconfig
>> > under "MX6 board select". Some of these options are named "Support
>> > <boardname>" (e.g. "Support udoo"), while others are simply called
>> > "<boardname>" (e.g. "Bachmann OT1200").
>> >
>> > I would prefer the simple "<boardname>" naming style for all options and
>> > remove the word "Support" from all description strings. But this is only
>> > my personal opinion and a minor cosmetic change.
>>
>> Checking in other architecture, I see there is no rule about this. Even
>> in the same Kconfig (AT91), there is a mix with and without "Support".
>> Both are ok - decide yourself.
>
> The "Support" is implicit (you won't select it if you didn't want to support
> that board, would you?), so please use just the board name.
>


The prompts "Support <lower-case board name>" were automatically created by tool
based on boards.cfg when U-boot switched to Kconfig.

Later, some of them were rephrased without "Support" by hand.

In other words, the boards with "Support" have been untouched
since the automatic conversion.

Actually, arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig has a mix with and without "Support".
I only rephrased the boards which have device trees in Linux Kernel,
because device trees often include official board names.
I could not find the better names for the others.

Better prompts are always welcome.



-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada