[U-Boot] [PATCH v4] x86: baytrail: Configure FSP UPD from device tree

Bin Meng bmeng.cn at gmail.com
Tue Aug 11 04:53:00 CEST 2015


Hi Andrew,

On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Andrew Bradford
<andrew at bradfordembedded.com> wrote:
> Hi Bin,
>
> On 08/09 10:52, Bin Meng wrote:
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Andrew Bradford
>> <andrew at bradfordembedded.com> wrote:
>> > Hi Simon,
>> >
>> > On 08/08 10:18, Simon Glass wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> On 7 August 2015 at 06:44, Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 8:36 PM, Andrew Bradford
>> >> > <andrew at bradfordembedded.com> wrote:
>> >> >> From: Andrew Bradford <andrew.bradford at kodakalaris.com>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Allow for configuration of FSP UPD from the device tree which will
>> >> >> override any settings which the FSP was built with itself.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Modify the MinnowMax and BayleyBay boards to transfer sensible UPD
>> >> >> settings from the Intel FSPv4 Gold release to the respective dts files,
>> >> >> with the condition that the memory-down parameters for MinnowMax are
>> >> >> also used.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Bradford <andrew.bradford at kodakalaris.com>
>> >> >> ---
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com>
>> >> > Tested-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com>
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
>> >> Tested on minnowmax:
>> >> Tested-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
>> >>
>> >> I found that I need to remove two properties from the minnowmax.dts:
>> >>
>> >> - fsp,enable-xhci needs to be removed as this does not work in U-Boot
>> >> at present and stops EHCI from working
>> >> - fsp,mrc-debug-msg needs to be removed to prevent debug information
>> >> being displayed
>> >>
>> >> I plan to apply this with these changes - please let me know if this
>> >> doesn't suit.
>> >
>> > I'm OK with disabling xhci and the MRC debug output in the FSP.
>> >
>> > But if xhci is disabled then I believe when Linux boots that the USB 3.0
>> > port on Minnow Max will only act as a USB 2.0 port.  That u-boot doesn't
>> > yet have working XHCI on E3800 means there is a tradeoff and I wasn't
>> > sure which was a better choice.
>>
>> Does these xHCI ports on MinnowMax work fully on Linux kernel? If it
>> works, I'd rather we keep fsp,enable-xhci in the U-Boot.
>
> I believe that the xhci port does work on Minnow Max in Linux but I do
> not have a board so I'm unable to test, sorry.
>

OK, my test shows that ehci works fine in U-Boot on Bayley Bay.

Hi Simon,

What do you think regarding to xhci vs. ehci in U-Boot?

Regards,
Bin


More information about the U-Boot mailing list