[U-Boot] [PATCH 08/25] tpm: tpm_tis_i2c: Drop struct tpm_vendor_specific

[Simon Glass]

Hi Christophe,

On 11 August 2015 at 15:47, christophe.ricard
<christophe.ricard at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> Locality concept are valid almost on any chip assuming if no locality are
> supported the default one is locality 0.
> I would leave this change open for discussion.
>
> However, as per patch 06 & 07, i would keep req_complete_mask,
> req_complete_val, req_canceled, timeout_a, timeout_b, timeout_c, timeout_d
> in tpm_vendor_specific structure as this is chip specific.
>
> I really think tpm_vendor_specific is usefull for managing different kind of
> TPM "the same way"/following standards.

That code belongs in the uclass I think. If there really are generic
settings that are needed for all TPMs then it should sit there. We
don't want to have an additional layer of stuff that doesn't relate to
driver model.

I'll refrain from commenting further until we can work out what the
TPM uclass should look like.

> Best Regards
> Christophe
>
[snip]

Regards,
Simon