[U-Boot] [PATCH 07/25] tpm: tpm_tis_i2c: Drop unnecessary methods
Simon Glass
sjg at chromium.org
Fri Aug 14 00:53:03 CEST 2015
Hi Christophe,
On 13 August 2015 at 14:28, Christophe Ricard
<christophe.ricard at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On 13/08/2015 03:30, Simon Glass wrote:
>>
>> Hi Christophe,
>>
>> On 11 August 2015 at 15:47, christophe.ricard
>> <christophe.ricard at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Simon,
>>>
>>> As per my comment on patch 6, i would disagree as well on this one.
>>> It tpm_vendor_specific structure is convenient for ST33ZP24 for example.
>>>
>>> Best Regards
>>> Christophe
>>>
>> As things stand they are only used in one place. I think we should
>> work out the best uclass API for the TPM and then go with that.
>
> I agree with that.
> How do you want to proceed ? Do you agree to integrate the results of our
> exchanges for a new round ?
Yes OK, I'll have a crack at this.
Regards,
Simon
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list