[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/5] Make RBTREE selectable by Kconfig

[Joe Hershberger]

Hi Lars,

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Joe Hershberger
<joe.hershberger at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Lars,
>
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Joe Hershberger
> <joe.hershberger at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Lars,
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 3:25 AM, Lars Poeschel <poeschel at lemonage.de> wrote:
>>> Hi Joe,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:03:59AM -0500, Joe Hershberger wrote:
>>>> >> I beat you to it: http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2015-May/214261.html
>>>> >
>>>> > Well, ... ok. You won ;-) Your patchset is by far more comprehensive than
>>>> > mine.
>>>> > If I see this right in the archives, you did not receive any comments
>>>> > since nearly a month.
>>>>
>>>> That is true. I really would like a little feedback on it... or maybe
>>>> I can just drop the controversial one and only include these things...
>>>> they seem to be mostly straightforward.
>>>>
>>>> > This was RFC will you resend this as a "real" PATCH ?
>>>>
>>>> Yes.
>>>>
>>>> > Could you then include two of the dependencies from my patches:
>>>> > I think CMD_UBI has to depend on MTD_PARTITIONS and obivously CMD_UBIFS

I noticed when adding MTD_PARTITIONS that MTD_DEVICE is not moved over
yet. Do you know what the dependency relationship is there? If not
I'll dig into it a bit.

>>>> > has to depend on CMD_UBI.
>>>>
>>>> Will do.
>>>
>>> I saw no action from you on this one. Can I help out - at least for the
>>> decompression / ubi / ubifs part ?
>>
>> Sorry about that... the end of last release got a little crazy.
>>
>>> I think the setexpr / env location parts from your patchset can then go
>>> in as seperate patches.
>>
>> I agree. I'll split them apart and send these out.
>
> I haven't forgotten about this... I plan to get this sent out this week.

I had this ready to go, but conflicts with
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/508134/, so I'm gonna have to
regenerate the moves after that goes in.

-Joe