[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/5] Make RBTREE selectable by Kconfig

[Joe Hershberger]

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 01:47:20PM -0500, Joe Hershberger wrote:
>> Hi Lars,
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Joe Hershberger
>> <joe.hershberger at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi Lars,
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Joe Hershberger
>> > <joe.hershberger at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Hi Lars,
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 3:25 AM, Lars Poeschel <poeschel at lemonage.de> wrote:
>> >>> Hi Joe,
>> >>>
>> >>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:03:59AM -0500, Joe Hershberger wrote:
>> >>>> >> I beat you to it: http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2015-May/214261.html
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > Well, ... ok. You won ;-) Your patchset is by far more comprehensive than
>> >>>> > mine.
>> >>>> > If I see this right in the archives, you did not receive any comments
>> >>>> > since nearly a month.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> That is true. I really would like a little feedback on it... or maybe
>> >>>> I can just drop the controversial one and only include these things...
>> >>>> they seem to be mostly straightforward.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> > This was RFC will you resend this as a "real" PATCH ?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Yes.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> > Could you then include two of the dependencies from my patches:
>> >>>> > I think CMD_UBI has to depend on MTD_PARTITIONS and obivously CMD_UBIFS
>>
>> I noticed when adding MTD_PARTITIONS that MTD_DEVICE is not moved over
>> yet. Do you know what the dependency relationship is there? If not
>> I'll dig into it a bit.
>>
>> >>>> > has to depend on CMD_UBI.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Will do.
>> >>>
>> >>> I saw no action from you on this one. Can I help out - at least for the
>> >>> decompression / ubi / ubifs part ?
>> >>
>> >> Sorry about that... the end of last release got a little crazy.
>> >>
>> >>> I think the setexpr / env location parts from your patchset can then go
>> >>> in as seperate patches.
>> >>
>> >> I agree. I'll split them apart and send these out.
>> >
>> > I haven't forgotten about this... I plan to get this sent out this week.
>>
>> I had this ready to go, but conflicts with
>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/508134/, so I'm gonna have to
>> regenerate the moves after that goes in.
>
> Note that since it's part of the E1000 series I gave it to you in
> patchwork :)

Sure, I expect to take it in once all feedback is addressed on that series. :)

-Joe