[U-Boot] [PATCH] h2200: Fix build error

[Kishon Vijay Abraham I]

On Friday 21 August 2015 11:15 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On Friday, August 21, 2015 at 07:43:44 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>> Hi Marek,
>>
>> On Friday 21 August 2015 11:03 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On Friday, August 21, 2015 at 07:32:04 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>>>> Commit <8bfc288c3955> ("usb: gadget: ether: Perform board
>>>> initialization from ethernet gadget driver") added board_usb_init
>>>> and board_usb_cleanup in ethernet gadget driver. But h2200 board
>>>> didn't have board_usb_init and board_usb_cleanup implementations.
>>>>
>>>> This introduced the following build errors
>>>> +drivers/usb/gadget/built-in.o: In function `usb_eth_halt':
>>>> +drivers/usb/gadget/ether.c:2498: undefined reference to
>>>> `board_usb_cleanup' +drivers/usb/gadget/built-in.o: In function
>>>> `usb_eth_init':
>>>> +drivers/usb/gadget/ether.c:2316: undefined reference to
>>>> `board_usb_init'
>>>>
>>>> Fix it here by adding empty board_usb_init and board_usb_cleanup
>>>> functions in h2200.c.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: <8bfc288c3955> ("usb: gadget: ether: Perform board
>>>> initialization from ethernet gadget driver")
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon at ti.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>>  board/h2200/h2200.c |   12 ++++++++++++
>>>>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/board/h2200/h2200.c b/board/h2200/h2200.c
>>>> index 66ae4b6..01f8e67 100644
>>>> --- a/board/h2200/h2200.c
>>>> +++ b/board/h2200/h2200.c
>>>> @@ -59,3 +59,15 @@ int dram_init(void)
>>>>
>>>>  	gd->ram_size = CONFIG_SYS_SDRAM_SIZE;
>>>>  	return 0;
>>>>  
>>>>  }
>>>>
>>>> +
>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_USB_GADGET_PXA2XX
>>>> +int board_usb_init(int index, enum usb_init_type init)
>>>> +{
>>>> +	return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +int board_usb_cleanup(int index, enum usb_init_type init)
>>>> +{
>>>> +	return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +#endif
>>>
>>> Shouldn't this go into the PXA2xx UDC driver instead as a set of
>>> __weak functions ?
>>
>> thought all board_* functions should be added in board files. but
>> I think whatever you are telling makes sense. Will post a new version.
> 
> Ow, we don't even have a default implementation of these anywhere.
> In that case, I think this patch is all right and if noone is opposed,
> I'll pick it as is. Sorry for the noise.

ah.. alright.

Thanks
Kishon