[U-Boot] [PATCH 8/8] x86: quark: Optimize MRC execution time
Bin Meng
bmeng.cn at gmail.com
Mon Aug 31 15:43:45 CEST 2015
Hi Simon,
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 9:20 PM, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
> Hi Bin,
>
> On 31 August 2015 at 03:52, Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Boot time performance degradation is observed with the conversion
>> to use dm pci. Intel Quark SoC has a low end x86 processor with
>> only 400MHz frequency and the most time consuming part is with MRC.
>> Each MRC register programming requires indirect access via pci bus.
>> With dm pci, accessing pci configuration space has some overhead.
>> Unfortunately this single access overhead gets accumulated in the
>> whole MRC process, and finally leads to twice boot time (25 seconds)
>> than before (12 seconds).
>>
>> To speed up the boot, create an optimized version of pci config
>> read/write routines without bothering to go through driver model.
>> Now it only takes about 3 seconds to finish MRC, which is really
>> fast (8 times faster than dm pci, or 4 times faster than before).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com>
>> ---
>>
>> arch/x86/cpu/quark/msg_port.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> Before I delve into the patch - with driver model we are using the I/O
> method - see pci_x86_read_config(). Is that the source of the slowdown
> or is it just general driver model overhead.
The MRC calls APIs in arch/x86/cpu/quark/msg_port.c to program DDR
controller. Inside msg_port.c, pci_write_config_dword() and
pci_read_config_dword() are called.
With driver model, the overhead is:
pci_write_config_dword() -> pci_write_config32() -> pci_write_config()
-> uclass_get_device_by_seq() then pci_bus_write_config() will finally
call pci_x86_read_config().
Without driver model, there is still some overhead (so previously the
MRC time was about 12 seconds)
pci_write_config_dword() -> pci_hose_write_config_dword() ->
TYPE1_PCI_OP(write, dword, u32, outl, 0)
With my optimized version, pci_write_config_dword() directly calls a
hardcoded dword size pci config access, without the need to consider
offset and mask, and dereferencing hose->cfg_addr/cfg->data.
>
> If the former then perhaps we should change this. If the latter then
> we have work to do...
>
Regards,
Bin
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list