[U-Boot] [PATCH 11/13] arm: zynq: dts: Add U-Boot device tree additions
Simon Glass
sjg at chromium.org
Mon Aug 31 15:54:38 CEST 2015
Hi Michal,
On 31 August 2015 at 05:30, Michal Simek <monstr at monstr.eu> wrote:
> On 08/29/2015 05:10 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> We need to mark some device tree nodes so that they are available before
>> relocation. This enables driver model to find these automatically. In the
>> case of SPL it ensures that these nodes will be retained in SPL.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
>> ---
>>
>> arch/arm/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi | 1 +
>> arch/arm/dts/zynq-microzed.dts | 5 +++++
>> arch/arm/dts/zynq-picozed.dts | 5 +++++
>> arch/arm/dts/zynq-zc702.dts | 1 +
>> arch/arm/dts/zynq-zc706.dts | 1 +
>> arch/arm/dts/zynq-zc770-xm010.dts | 1 +
>> arch/arm/dts/zynq-zc770-xm011.dts | 1 +
>> arch/arm/dts/zynq-zc770-xm012.dts | 1 +
>> arch/arm/dts/zynq-zc770-xm013.dts | 1 +
>> arch/arm/dts/zynq-zed.dts | 1 +
>> arch/arm/dts/zynq-zybo.dts | 1 +
>> 11 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi b/arch/arm/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi
>> index 0b62cb0..12614f2 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi
>> @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@
>> };
>>
>> amba: amba {
>> + u-boot,dm-pre-reloc;
>> compatible = "simple-bus";
>> #address-cells = <1>;
>> #size-cells = <1>;
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/zynq-microzed.dts b/arch/arm/dts/zynq-microzed.dts
>> index c373a2c..5dff18e6 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/dts/zynq-microzed.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm/dts/zynq-microzed.dts
>> @@ -21,3 +21,8 @@
>> reg = <0 0x40000000>;
>> };
>> };
>> +
>> +&uart1 {
>> + u-boot,dm-pre-reloc;
>
> Was this reviewed on DT mailing list?
There is a thread going at present for Raspberry Pi but it had not
yielded much light last time I looked.
>
> TBH adding this to every node seems to me a lot of work.
This i how it works at present. Typically we only have a UART and that
is not necessary since U-Boot can force-bind this. But when the UART
is not in the root node we have to add something.
> Why not just add one more uboot property to chosen with list of IPs
> which needs to be relocated?
You mean a list of devices needed before relocation?
If you like you could look at working up a patch for this. I'm
certainly interested in other ideas. It does need to be efficient.
Regards,
Simon
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list