[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/4] ubifs: Modify ubifs u-boot wrapper function prototypes for generic fs use

[Hans de Goede]

Hi,

On 28-08-15 16:52, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 01:32:05PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 25-08-15 13:00, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>>> Hello Hans,
>>>
>>> Am 22.08.2015 um 20:04 schrieb Hans de Goede:
>>>> Modify the ubifs u-boot wrapper function prototypes for generic fs use,
>>>> and give them their own header file.
>>>>
>>>> This is a preparation patch for adding ubifs support to the generic fs
>>>> code from fs/fs.c.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>   common/cmd_ubifs.c    | 14 +++--------
>>>>   fs/ubifs/ubifs.c      | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>>>>   fs/ubifs/ubifs.h      |  6 +----
>>>>   include/ubifs_uboot.h | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>   4 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>>>>   create mode 100644 include/ubifs_uboot.h
>>>
>>> Only one nitpick, beside of this, you can add my:
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Heiko Schocher <hs at denx.de>
>>>
>>>> diff --git a/common/cmd_ubifs.c b/common/cmd_ubifs.c
>>>> index 8e9a4e5..0a3dd24 100644
>>>> --- a/common/cmd_ubifs.c
>>>> +++ b/common/cmd_ubifs.c
>>>> @@ -15,11 +15,10 @@
>>>>   #include <common.h>
>>>>   #include <config.h>
>>>>   #include <command.h>
>>>> -
>>>> -#include "../fs/ubifs/ubifs.h"
>>>> +#include <ubifs_uboot.h>
>>>>
>>>>   static int ubifs_initialized;
>>>> -static int ubifs_mounted;
>>>> +int ubifs_mounted;
>>>
>>> later you add "extern int ubifs_mounted" in include/ubifs_uboot.h
>>>
>>> Maybe you want to add a function, which returns the state
>>> of this var and let the var static?
>>
>> Yes that would be cleaner, I'll fix the patch-set to do
>> things that way.
>>
>> Thanks for the reviews.
>>
>> So when the time come comes (when v2015.10 is out), how do
>> we merge these 3, shall I take them upstream through the
>> linux-sunxi tree, or do you want me to send a v2 with this fixed,
>> and then you take them upstream ?
>
> I can just take 'em all into master :)

Heiko and I both thought we were too far in the cycle for that,
but I must admit I do not see that much chance of these changes
causing regressions and they are a nice improvement.

So I'll send a v2 for you to merge, unless Heiko objects.

Regards,

Hans