[U-Boot] [PATCH] i2c: mxc: allow executing the code that only applies to i.MX platforms

Gong Q.Y. Qianyu.Gong at freescale.com
Mon Dec 14 12:03:29 CET 2015


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sun York-R58495
> Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 6:37 PM
> To: Gong Qianyu-B52263; u-boot at lists.denx.de
> Cc: Hu Mingkai-B21284; Sun York-R58495; Fan Peng-B51431
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: mxc: allow executing the code that only applies
> to i.MX platforms
> 
> 
> 
> On 12/14/2015 06:23 PM, Gong Qianyu wrote:
> > The bus_i2c_init() is called before relocation and will assgin value
> > to a static variable. If U-Boot is then still running in a flash
> > device, it's theoretically not allowed to write data to flash without
> > an erasing operation. For i.MX platforms, the U-Boot is always running
> > in DDR.
> >
> > Actually it causes asynchronous error when the ARM64 system error
> > report is enabled and the flash write protect is set.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gong Qianyu <Qianyu.Gong at freescale.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/i2c/mxc_i2c.c | 3 +++
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/mxc_i2c.c b/drivers/i2c/mxc_i2c.c index
> > fa4c82f..4dddb83 100644
> > --- a/drivers/i2c/mxc_i2c.c
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/mxc_i2c.c
> > @@ -581,8 +581,11 @@ void bus_i2c_init(int index, int speed, int unused,
> >  		return;
> >  	}
> >
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_MX51) || defined(CONFIG_MX53) || \
> > +	defined(CONFIG_MX6) || defined(CONFIG_MX7)
> >  	mxc_i2c_buses[index].idle_bus_fn = idle_bus_fn;
> >  	mxc_i2c_buses[index].idle_bus_data = idle_bus_data;
> > +#endif
> >
> 
> I also think using variable mxc_i2c_buses is problematic. But using ifdef
> doesn't look like a solution. I think this variable should be put into
> stack, or use malloc. It works with execution-in-place in read-only space.
> 
> York

But we don't know if the stack will be enough before relocation. For SD boot of LS1043A, 

there is now only 4KB for it and if the spl image is bigger in the future, the stack is 

smaller. So isn't leaving more stack(if possible) for necessary code better? 



More information about the U-Boot mailing list