[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] dm: Add support for all targets which requires MANUAL_RELOC

Simon Glass sjg at chromium.org
Mon Feb 9 23:14:36 CET 2015


Hi MIchal,

On 9 February 2015 at 03:27, Michal Simek <michal.simek at xilinx.com> wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On 02/06/2015 06:45 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> On 4 February 2015 at 23:31, Michal Simek <michal.simek at xilinx.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 02/05/2015 04:07 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>>> Hi Michal,
>>>>
>>>> On 3 February 2015 at 17:40, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
>>>>> Hi Michal,
>>>>>
>>>>> On 3 February 2015 at 02:11, Michal Simek <michal.simek at xilinx.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Simon,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 02/03/2015 03:02 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 16:57:15 -0700
>>>>>>> Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Michal,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2 February 2015 at 08:31, Michal Simek <michal.simek at xilinx.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Targets with CONFIG_NEEDS_MANUAL_RELOC do not use REL/RELA
>>>>>>>>> relocation (mostly only GOT) where functions aray are not
>>>>>>>>> updated. This patch is fixing function pointers for DM core
>>>>>>>>> and serial-uclass to ensure that relocated functions are called.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek at xilinx.com>
>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  drivers/core/root.c            | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>>  drivers/serial/serial-uclass.c | 16 +++++++++++
>>>>>>>>>  2 files changed, 80 insertions(+)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How long will we have to carry this patch? It seems that if we add any
>>>>>>>> new driver we will have to add more code like this?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This patch is unfortunate.
>>>>>>> Can we discontinue CONFIG_NEEDS_MANUAL_RELOC some day?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This patch (or similar one) has to be alive when we have platform
>>>>>> which requires CONFIG_NEEDS_MANUAL_RELOC for full u-boot.
>>>>>> There is an option to move to REL/RELA but the question is if
>>>>>> all platforms have it/support it. Unfortunately I think that
>>>>>> it will be in the tree for a long time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If we use SPL, we do not have to relocate code, I think.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> SPL doesn't have relocation that's why this code is not used there.
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe I asked this before, but when can we remove
>>>>> CONFIG_NEEDS_MANUAL_RELOC? What platforms need it?
>>>>
>>>> Sorry if you answered these questions but can you please resend if so
>>>> as I missed it.
>>>
>>> Graeme has answered it + my response here.
>>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2015-February/203911.html
>>>
>>> removing: When all platforms are moved to REL/RELA we can remove this
>>> manual reloc option.
>>
>> With a heavy heart:
>>
>> Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
>>
>
> Are you going to take this patch to your DM tree?

I'm hoping to bring in the Kconfig patches and send a pull request
this week, so could do that if it suits. But it is up to you, so let's
do whatever makes your life easier. Let me know.

Regards,
Simon


More information about the U-Boot mailing list