[U-Boot] [U-Boot, 1/2, v4] powerpc/mpc85xx: SECURE BOOT- NAND secure boot target for P3041

Scott Wood scottwood at freescale.com
Fri Feb 27 05:51:55 CET 2015


On Thu, 2015-02-26 at 22:35 -0600, Bansal Aneesh-B39320 wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wood Scott-B07421
> > Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 3:43 AM
> > To: Bansal Aneesh-B39320
> > Cc: u-boot at lists.denx.de; Sun York-R58495; Gupta Ruchika-R66431
> > Subject: Re: [U-Boot, 1/2, v4] powerpc/mpc85xx: SECURE BOOT- NAND
> > secure boot target for P3041
> > 
> > [Reposting comment on v4 as York requested]
> > 
> > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 02:17:56PM +0530, Aneesh Bansal wrote:
> > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/cpu_init.c
> > > b/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/cpu_init.c
> > > index 4cf8853..ef56cc0 100644
> > > --- a/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/cpu_init.c
> > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/cpu_init.c
> > > @@ -843,6 +843,23 @@ int cpu_init_r(void)
> > >  	setup_mp();
> > >  #endif
> > >
> > > +#if defined(CONFIG_SYS_RAMBOOT) &&
> > defined(CONFIG_SYS_INIT_L3_ADDR) && \
> > > +	defined(CONFIG_SECURE_BOOT)
> > > +	/* Disable the TLB Created for L3 and create the TLB required for
> > > +	 * PCIE (CONFIG_SYS_PCIE1_MEM_VIRT) which was not created
> > earlier.
> > > +	 */
> > > +	int tlb_index;
> > > +	tlb_index = find_tlb_idx((void *)CONFIG_BPTR_VIRT_ADDR, 1);
> > > +	if (tlb_index != -1) {
> > > +		disable_tlb(tlb_index);
> > > +
> > > +		set_tlb(1, CONFIG_SYS_PCIE1_MEM_VIRT,
> > > +			CONFIG_SYS_PCIE1_MEM_PHYS,
> > > +			MAS3_SW|MAS3_SR, MAS2_I|MAS2_G,
> > > +			0, tlb_index, BOOKE_PAGESZ_1G, 1);
> > > +	}
> > > +#endif
> > 
> > Why are you assuming in generic 85xx code that the TLB for PCIE1 needs to
> > be created?  e500mc should have enough TLB1 entries that you don't need to
> > share (or if it's due to address conflicts, a board may have PCI at a different
> > address), and PCI may not exist at all on some boards.
> > 
> > -Scott
> 
> TLB's are created in freescale/common/p_corenet/tlb.c

Which doesn't apply to all 85xx boards (even custom corenet-based boards
might not use it -- or if that's not the case, it should be moved out of
the board directory).  It's also not obvious to anyone modifying that
tlb.c file or the address of PCIE1 that this would be affected.

> In case of Secure Boot, L3 is used as 1M SRAM and the address of the SRAM is at 0xbff00000.

Is this hardcoded into the silicon, or determined by PBI or something
similar?  If it's not hardcoded, can we choose a less problematic
address?

If it is hardcoded, and we don't want to change the PCIE1 virtual
address, at least create defines for the entry to be created once SRAM
goes away, rather than hardcoding PCIE1 here.

-Scott




More information about the U-Boot mailing list