[U-Boot] [PATCH V3 0/6] Tegra210/P2571 initial support

Tom Warren TWarren at nvidia.com
Mon Jul 27 23:51:11 CEST 2015


TomR/Albert,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Warren [mailto:swarren at wwwdotorg.org]
> Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 11:01 AM
> To: Tom Warren
> Cc: u-boot at lists.denx.de; Thierry Reding; Stephen Warren;
> tomcwarren3959 at gmail.com
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 0/6] Tegra210/P2571 initial support
> 
> On 07/24/2015 04:00 PM, Tom Warren wrote:
> > This patch series adds support for the Tegra210 SoC and the P2571
> > board. Most of the T210 info is identical to T124 at this point, so I
> > just cloned Venice2/Jetson-TK1 board files and T124 header/SoC code.
> > Pinmux is the major area of difference at this time, but other changes
> > will be made as more features of the board are brought up.
> 
> The series,
> 
> Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren at nvidia.com>
> 
> I've also validated that:
> 
> a) I can compile it when applied to upstream u-boot/master (a couple days
> old).
> 
> b) I applied it to our internal L4T U-Boot branch, ported it to another
> T210 board, flashed it, and booted an L4T kernel (with a few other L4T-specific
> patches on top).
> 
> I don't think that's quite enough for a Tested-by tag upstream since I haven't
> actually booted the upstream code, but it's good enough for me to consider
> the series tested:-) 

I've applied my T210 work on top of Stephen's recent 10-patch 'arm' 64-bit cleanup series and his 3-patch 'tegra' 64-bit fixes, onto my current u-boot-tegra/master after rebasing it against TOT u-boot/master. Everything builds OK (all Tegra 32-bit, and all ARM 64-bit), and my T210 boots OK to cmd prompt, with all periphs working (USB, I2C, SPI, GPIO, MMC).

So my question is, how should I go about issuing a PR for the T210 work? It should apply OK w/o Stephen's 64-bit fixes, but it won't build w/o them. But only a few are actually Tegra-specific (the 3 from today). 

Is it OK if I send one PR with _all_ these patches in u-boot-tegra/master, including the 'arm' 64-bit, the 'tegra' 64-bit, and finally my T210 series on top? Or do you want them split up and the 'arm' 64-bit fixes taken in to either u-boot-arm/master or u-boot/master first (just pulled from the list, I guess), then a PR from me for the 3 Tegra 64-bit fixes plus my T210 series?

Let me know,

Tom

--
nvpublic


More information about the U-Boot mailing list