[U-Boot] [PATCH V3 0/6] Tegra210/P2571 initial support

[Tom Rini]

On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 09:51:11PM +0000, Tom Warren wrote:
> TomR/Albert,
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Stephen Warren [mailto:swarren at wwwdotorg.org]
> > Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 11:01 AM
> > To: Tom Warren
> > Cc: u-boot at lists.denx.de; Thierry Reding; Stephen Warren;
> > tomcwarren3959 at gmail.com
> > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 0/6] Tegra210/P2571 initial support
> > 
> > On 07/24/2015 04:00 PM, Tom Warren wrote:
> > > This patch series adds support for the Tegra210 SoC and the P2571
> > > board. Most of the T210 info is identical to T124 at this point, so I
> > > just cloned Venice2/Jetson-TK1 board files and T124 header/SoC code.
> > > Pinmux is the major area of difference at this time, but other changes
> > > will be made as more features of the board are brought up.
> > 
> > The series,
> > 
> > Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren at nvidia.com>
> > 
> > I've also validated that:
> > 
> > a) I can compile it when applied to upstream u-boot/master (a couple days
> > old).
> > 
> > b) I applied it to our internal L4T U-Boot branch, ported it to another
> > T210 board, flashed it, and booted an L4T kernel (with a few other L4T-specific
> > patches on top).
> > 
> > I don't think that's quite enough for a Tested-by tag upstream since I haven't
> > actually booted the upstream code, but it's good enough for me to consider
> > the series tested:-) 
> 
> I've applied my T210 work on top of Stephen's recent 10-patch 'arm' 64-bit cleanup series and his 3-patch 'tegra' 64-bit fixes, onto my current u-boot-tegra/master after rebasing it against TOT u-boot/master. Everything builds OK (all Tegra 32-bit, and all ARM 64-bit), and my T210 boots OK to cmd prompt, with all periphs working (USB, I2C, SPI, GPIO, MMC).
> 
> So my question is, how should I go about issuing a PR for the T210 work? It should apply OK w/o Stephen's 64-bit fixes, but it won't build w/o them. But only a few are actually Tegra-specific (the 3 from today). 
> 
> Is it OK if I send one PR with _all_ these patches in u-boot-tegra/master, including the 'arm' 64-bit, the 'tegra' 64-bit, and finally my T210 series on top? Or do you want them split up and the 'arm' 64-bit fixes taken in to either u-boot-arm/master or u-boot/master first (just pulled from the list, I guess), then a PR from me for the 3 Tegra 64-bit fixes plus my T210 series?

One PR with everything sounds OK to me.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20150727/9e747d44/attachment.sig>