[U-Boot] [PATCH 4/9] x86: Move MP initialization codes into a common place
Simon Glass
sjg at chromium.org
Fri Jun 12 01:39:02 CEST 2015
Hi Bin,
On 9 June 2015 at 01:45, Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com> wrote:
> Most of the MP initialization codes in arch/x86/cpu/baytrail/cpu.c is
> common to all x86 processors, except detect_num_cpus() which varies
> from cpu to cpu. Move these to arch/x86/cpu/cpu.c and declare a weak
> detect_num_cpus() which just returns 2 which is minimally required.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com>
> ---
>
> arch/x86/cpu/baytrail/cpu.c | 44 +-----------------------------------------
> arch/x86/cpu/cpu.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/cpu/baytrail/cpu.c b/arch/x86/cpu/baytrail/cpu.c
> index 05156a5..7805056 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/cpu/baytrail/cpu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/cpu/baytrail/cpu.c
> @@ -12,23 +12,11 @@
> #include <asm/cpu.h>
> #include <asm/cpu_x86.h>
> #include <asm/lapic.h>
> -#include <asm/mp.h>
> #include <asm/msr.h>
> #include <asm/turbo.h>
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> -static int enable_smis(struct udevice *cpu, void *unused)
> -{
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -static struct mp_flight_record mp_steps[] = {
> - MP_FR_BLOCK_APS(mp_init_cpu, NULL, mp_init_cpu, NULL),
> - /* Wait for APs to finish initialization before proceeding. */
> - MP_FR_BLOCK_APS(NULL, NULL, enable_smis, NULL),
> -};
> -
> -static int detect_num_cpus(void)
> +int detect_num_cpus(void)
> {
> int ecx = 0;
>
> @@ -52,38 +40,8 @@ static int detect_num_cpus(void)
> ecx++;
> }
> }
> -
> -static int baytrail_init_cpus(void)
> -{
> - struct mp_params mp_params;
> -
> - lapic_setup();
> -
> - mp_params.num_cpus = detect_num_cpus();
> - mp_params.parallel_microcode_load = 0,
> - mp_params.flight_plan = &mp_steps[0];
> - mp_params.num_records = ARRAY_SIZE(mp_steps);
> - mp_params.microcode_pointer = 0;
> -
> - if (mp_init(&mp_params)) {
> - printf("Warning: MP init failure\n");
> - return -EIO;
> - }
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> #endif
>
> -int x86_init_cpus(void)
> -{
> -#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> - debug("Init additional CPUs\n");
> - baytrail_init_cpus();
> -#endif
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> static void set_max_freq(void)
> {
> msr_t perf_ctl;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/cpu/cpu.c b/arch/x86/cpu/cpu.c
> index ffb6e43..ddc7dc3 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/cpu/cpu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/cpu/cpu.c
> @@ -21,10 +21,13 @@
>
> #include <common.h>
> #include <command.h>
> +#include <dm.h>
> #include <errno.h>
> #include <malloc.h>
> #include <asm/control_regs.h>
> #include <asm/cpu.h>
> +#include <asm/lapic.h>
> +#include <asm/mp.h>
> #include <asm/post.h>
> #include <asm/processor.h>
> #include <asm/processor-flags.h>
> @@ -601,8 +604,52 @@ int last_stage_init(void)
> }
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> +static int enable_smis(struct udevice *cpu, void *unused)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct mp_flight_record mp_steps[] = {
> + MP_FR_BLOCK_APS(mp_init_cpu, NULL, mp_init_cpu, NULL),
> + /* Wait for APs to finish initialization before proceeding */
> + MP_FR_BLOCK_APS(NULL, NULL, enable_smis, NULL),
> +};
> +
> +__weak int detect_num_cpus(void)
Does this need to be weak? We could perhaps require that the function exists?
> +{
> + /* We need at least 2 cores to perform mp_init() */
> + return 2;
> +}
> +
> +static int x86_mp_init(void)
> +{
> + struct mp_params mp_params;
> +
> + lapic_setup();
> +
> + mp_params.num_cpus = detect_num_cpus();
> + mp_params.parallel_microcode_load = 0,
> + mp_params.flight_plan = &mp_steps[0];
> + mp_params.num_records = ARRAY_SIZE(mp_steps);
> + mp_params.microcode_pointer = 0;
> +
> + if (mp_init(&mp_params)) {
> + printf("Warning: MP init failure\n");
> + return -EIO;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> __weak int x86_init_cpus(void)
> {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> + debug("Init additional CPUs\n");
> + x86_mp_init();
> +#endif
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> --
> 1.8.2.1
>
Regards,
Simon
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list