[U-Boot] [PATCH] sf: update sst25wf040b flash params

[Jagan Teki]

On 29 June 2015 at 14:08, Wang Haikun <Haikun.Wang at freescale.com> wrote:
> On 6/27/2015 3:35 AM, Jagan Teki wrote:
>> On 26 June 2015 at 17:27, Haikun Wang <haikun.wang at freescale.com> wrote:
>>> From: Haikun Wang <Haikun.Wang at freescale.com>
>>>
>>> sst25wf040b doesn't support Auto Address Increment Programming command.
>>> Remove SST_WR flag.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Haikun Wang <B53464 at freescale.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c | 3 ++-
>>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c
>>> index c12e8c6..283087a 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c
>>> @@ -100,7 +100,8 @@ const struct spi_flash_params spi_flash_params_table[] = {
>>>          {"SST25WF010",     0xbf2502, 0x0,       64 * 1024,     2, RD_NORM,          SECT_4K | SST_WR},
>>>          {"SST25WF020",     0xbf2503, 0x0,       64 * 1024,     4, RD_NORM,          SECT_4K | SST_WR},
>>>          {"SST25WF040",     0xbf2504, 0x0,       64 * 1024,     8, RD_NORM,          SECT_4K | SST_WR},
>>> -       {"SST25WF040B",    0x621613, 0x0,       64 * 1024,     8, RD_NORM,          SECT_4K | SST_WR},
>>> +       {"SST25WF040B",    0x621613, 0x0,       64 * 1024,
>>> +        8, RD_NORM,        SECT_4K},
>>
>> Please check - extran line is not required?
> If I put them in one line, checkpatch will report a warning:
> WARNING: line over 80 characters.

No issues it's id table struct need to be readable.

>>
>>>          {"SST25WF080",     0xbf2505, 0x0,       64 * 1024,    16, RD_NORM,          SECT_4K | SST_WR},
>>>   #endif
>>>   #ifdef CONFIG_SPI_FLASH_WINBOND                /* WINBOND */
>>> --
>>> 1.9.1

thanks!
-- 
Jagan | openedev.