[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/8] Extend LPC32xx functionality and add LPC32xx-based work_92015 board

[Albert ARIBAUD]

Bonjour Jagan,

Le Mon, 30 Mar 2015 17:37:47 +0530, Jagan Teki
<jagannadh.teki at gmail.com> a écrit :

> Tom,
> 
> On 17 February 2015 at 21:40, Tom Rini <trini at ti.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 02:26:47PM +0100, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> >> Bonjour Tom,
> >>
> >> Le Tue, 17 Feb 2015 08:20:09 -0500, Tom Rini <trini at ti.com> a écrit :
> >>
> >> > On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 06:36:59PM +0100, Albert ARIBAUD (3ADEV) wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > This series extends functionality for the LPC32xx platform and
> >> > > introduces the WORK Microwave work_92105 board which makes use
> >> > > of the extended functionality.
> >> >
> >> > Along with the work_92105 problem, just dropping that patch results in
> >> > devkit3250 failing in another way:
> >> > +(devkit3250) ../arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/lpc32xx/devices.c:11:26: fatal
> >> > error: asm/arch/mux.h: No such file or directory
> >> > +(devkit3250)  #include <asm/arch/mux.h>
> >> > +(devkit3250) compilation terminated.
> >> > +(devkit3250) make[3]: *** [arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/lpc32xx/devices.o]
> >> > Error 1
> >> > +(devkit3250) make[2]: *** [arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/lpc32xx] Error 2
> >> > +(devkit3250) make[1]: *** [arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs] Error 2
> >> >
> >> > Not that it should matter here but my default toolchain is ELDK 5.5.2
> >>
> >> I've just (re-)tried building devkit3250 and it builds fine (apart from
> >> the warning that the board should be converted to generic).
> >>
> >> What commit did you apply the patch series over?
> >
> > There's a handful of things I'm merging shortly but that shouldn't
> > matter, so this is odd.  I see Jagan requested a few changes to the SPI
> > stuff so I'll pick up the series after that?  Thanks!
> 
> Updated my reviewed-by tag on v6 spi patch along with some typo, pick that
> when you take the series.

Actually there's a (normally final!) v7 coming in the next hours, but
there was no change on the SSP/SPI code. With your permission, I'll
'port over' your Reviewed-by from v6 5/8 to v7 5/9.

> thanks!

Thanks to you for reviewing.

Cordialement,
Albert ARIBAUD
3ADEV