[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/8] Extend LPC32xx functionality and add LPC32xx-based work_92015 board

[Jagan Teki]

On 31 March 2015 at 10:54, Albert ARIBAUD <albert.aribaud at 3adev.fr> wrote:
> Bonjour Jagan,
>
> Le Mon, 30 Mar 2015 17:37:47 +0530, Jagan Teki
> <jagannadh.teki at gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>> Tom,
>>
>> On 17 February 2015 at 21:40, Tom Rini <trini at ti.com> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 02:26:47PM +0100, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>> >> Bonjour Tom,
>> >>
>> >> Le Tue, 17 Feb 2015 08:20:09 -0500, Tom Rini <trini at ti.com> a écrit :
>> >>
>> >> > On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 06:36:59PM +0100, Albert ARIBAUD (3ADEV) wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > > This series extends functionality for the LPC32xx platform and
>> >> > > introduces the WORK Microwave work_92105 board which makes use
>> >> > > of the extended functionality.
>> >> >
>> >> > Along with the work_92105 problem, just dropping that patch results in
>> >> > devkit3250 failing in another way:
>> >> > +(devkit3250) ../arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/lpc32xx/devices.c:11:26: fatal
>> >> > error: asm/arch/mux.h: No such file or directory
>> >> > +(devkit3250)  #include <asm/arch/mux.h>
>> >> > +(devkit3250) compilation terminated.
>> >> > +(devkit3250) make[3]: *** [arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/lpc32xx/devices.o]
>> >> > Error 1
>> >> > +(devkit3250) make[2]: *** [arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/lpc32xx] Error 2
>> >> > +(devkit3250) make[1]: *** [arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs] Error 2
>> >> >
>> >> > Not that it should matter here but my default toolchain is ELDK 5.5.2
>> >>
>> >> I've just (re-)tried building devkit3250 and it builds fine (apart from
>> >> the warning that the board should be converted to generic).
>> >>
>> >> What commit did you apply the patch series over?
>> >
>> > There's a handful of things I'm merging shortly but that shouldn't
>> > matter, so this is odd.  I see Jagan requested a few changes to the SPI
>> > stuff so I'll pick up the series after that?  Thanks!
>>
>> Updated my reviewed-by tag on v6 spi patch along with some typo, pick that
>> when you take the series.
>
> Actually there's a (normally final!) v7 coming in the next hours, but
> there was no change on the SSP/SPI code. With your permission, I'll
> 'port over' your Reviewed-by from v6 5/8 to v7 5/9.

Sure, please fix a typo which I pointed in v6

>
>> thanks!
>
> Thanks to you for reviewing.

thanks!
-- 
Jagan.