[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/4] ubifs: Modify ubifs u-boot wrapper function prototypes for generic fs use

[Heiko Schocher]

Hello Hans,

Am 31.08.2015 um 18:08 schrieb Hans de Goede:
> Hi,
>
> On 28-08-15 16:52, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 01:32:05PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 25-08-15 13:00, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>>>> Hello Hans,
>>>>
>>>> Am 22.08.2015 um 20:04 schrieb Hans de Goede:
>>>>> Modify the ubifs u-boot wrapper function prototypes for generic fs use,
>>>>> and give them their own header file.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is a preparation patch for adding ubifs support to the generic fs
>>>>> code from fs/fs.c.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>   common/cmd_ubifs.c    | 14 +++--------
>>>>>   fs/ubifs/ubifs.c      | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>>>>>   fs/ubifs/ubifs.h      |  6 +----
>>>>>   include/ubifs_uboot.h | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>   4 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>>>>>   create mode 100644 include/ubifs_uboot.h
>>>>
>>>> Only one nitpick, beside of this, you can add my:
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Heiko Schocher <hs at denx.de>
>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/common/cmd_ubifs.c b/common/cmd_ubifs.c
>>>>> index 8e9a4e5..0a3dd24 100644
>>>>> --- a/common/cmd_ubifs.c
>>>>> +++ b/common/cmd_ubifs.c
>>>>> @@ -15,11 +15,10 @@
>>>>>   #include <common.h>
>>>>>   #include <config.h>
>>>>>   #include <command.h>
>>>>> -
>>>>> -#include "../fs/ubifs/ubifs.h"
>>>>> +#include <ubifs_uboot.h>
>>>>>
>>>>>   static int ubifs_initialized;
>>>>> -static int ubifs_mounted;
>>>>> +int ubifs_mounted;
>>>>
>>>> later you add "extern int ubifs_mounted" in include/ubifs_uboot.h
>>>>
>>>> Maybe you want to add a function, which returns the state
>>>> of this var and let the var static?
>>>
>>> Yes that would be cleaner, I'll fix the patch-set to do
>>> things that way.
>>>
>>> Thanks for the reviews.
>>>
>>> So when the time come comes (when v2015.10 is out), how do
>>> we merge these 3, shall I take them upstream through the
>>> linux-sunxi tree, or do you want me to send a v2 with this fixed,
>>> and then you take them upstream ?
>>
>> I can just take 'em all into master :)
>
> Heiko and I both thought we were too far in the cycle for that,
> but I must admit I do not see that much chance of these changes
> causing regressions and they are a nice improvement.
>
> So I'll send a v2 for you to merge, unless Heiko objects.

Let me do with your v2 some tests today, if they are ok its Toms
decision.

bye,
Heiko
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany