[U-Boot] [PATCH] fdt: add new fdt address parsing functions
Mugunthan V N
mugunthanvnm at ti.com
Tue Sep 15 09:55:37 CEST 2015
On Friday 11 September 2015 04:24 PM, Mugunthan V N wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 September 2015 11:38 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Monday, 7 September 2015, Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm at ti.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Friday 07 August 2015 03:01 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>>> From: Stephen Warren <swarren at nvidia.com>
>>>>
>>>> fdtdec_get_addr_size() hard-codes the number of cells used to represent
>>>> an address or size in DT. This is incorrect in many cases depending on
>>>> the DT binding for a particular node or property (e.g. it is incorrect
>>>> for the "reg" property). In most cases, DT parsing code must use the
>>>> properties #address-cells and #size-cells to parse addres properties.
>>>>
>>>> This change splits up the implementation of fdtdec_get_addr_size() so
>>>> that the core logic can be used for both hard-coded and non-hard-coded
>>>> cases. Various wrapper functions are implemented that support cases
>>>> where hard-coded cell counts should or should not be used, and where
>>>> the client does and doesn't know the parent node ID that contains the
>>>> properties #address-cells and #size-cells.
>>>>
>>>> dev_get_addr() is updated to use the new functions.
>>>>
>>>> Core functionality in fdtdec_get_addr_size_fixed() is widely tested via
>>>> fdtdec_get_addr_size(). I tested fdtdec_get_addr_size_auto_noparent() and
>>>> dev_get_addr() by manually modifying the Tegra I2C driver to invoke them.
>>>>
>>>> Much of the core implementation of fdtdec_get_addr_size_fixed(),
>>>> fdtdec_get_addr_size_auto_parent(), and
>>>> fdtdec_get_addr_size_auto_noparent() comes from Thierry Reding's
>>>> previous commit "fdt: Fix fdtdec_get_addr_size() for 64-bit".
>>>
>>> Tested this patch for cpsw ethernet dt migration to getting cpsw address
>>> space. Also dropped *#define DEBUG* in lib/fdtdev.c file.
>>>
>>> Tested-by: Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm at ti.com>
>>>
>> Thanks for testing this. I would like to apply this - are there any
>> other comments?
>>
>
> There is no other comments apart from removing #define DEBUG
>
Simon
Are you applying this patch?
Regards
Mugunthan V N
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list