[U-Boot] [Patch v2 11/16] armv8/ls1043ardb: Add nand boot support
Gong Q.Y.
Qianyu.Gong at freescale.com
Fri Sep 18 05:36:39 CEST 2015
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 4:16 AM
> To: Gong Qianyu-B52263
> Cc: u-boot at lists.denx.de; Hu Mingkai-B21284; Sun York-R58495; Hou
> Zhiqiang-B48286; Song Wenbin-B53747; Xie Shaohui-B21989; Wood Scott-
> B07421
> Subject: Re: [Patch v2 11/16] armv8/ls1043ardb: Add nand boot support
>
> On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 15:06 +0800, Gong Qianyu wrote:
> >
>
> >
> > +/* NAND SPL */
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_NAND_BOOT
> > +#define CONFIG_SPL_PBL_PAD
> > +#define CONFIG_SPL_FRAMEWORK
> > +#define CONFIG_SPL_LDSCRIPT "arch/arm/cpu/armv8/u-boot-
> spl.lds"
> > +#define CONFIG_SPL_TARGET "u-boot-with-spl.bin"
> > +#define CONFIG_SPL_LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT
> > +#define CONFIG_SPL_LIBGENERIC_SUPPORT #define CONFIG_SPL_ENV_SUPPORT
> > +#define CONFIG_SPL_WATCHDOG_SUPPORT #define CONFIG_SPL_I2C_SUPPORT
> > +#define CONFIG_SPL_SERIAL_SUPPORT #define
> > +CONFIG_SPL_MPC8XXX_INIT_DDR_SUPPORT
> > +#define CONFIG_SPL_NAND_SUPPORT
> > +#define CONFIG_SPL_DRIVERS_MISC_SUPPORT
> > +#define CONFIG_SPL_TEXT_BASE 0x10000000
> > +#define CONFIG_SPL_MAX_SIZE 0x1a000
> > +#define CONFIG_SPL_STACK 0x1001d000
> > +#define CONFIG_SPL_PAD_TO 0x1c000
> > +#define CONFIG_SYS_NAND_U_BOOT_OFFS CONFIG_SPL_PAD_TO #define
> > +CONFIG_SYS_NAND_U_BOOT_SIZE (640 << 10)
>
> You made the U-Boot size be block aligned (assuming 128k block size,
> which the SoC common file should not do), but its offset is not.
>
> -Scott
Eh, yes. The CONFIG_SPL_PAD_TO should be block aligned and put to board specific file assuming different NAND chips.
That reminds me. SPL and U-Boot size should be block aligned, so it is with the env size. Right?
Regards,
Qianyu
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list