[U-Boot] Custodian Repo for Broadcom (arm) boards

[Tom Rini]

On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 03:13:37PM -0700, Steve Rae wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 03:01:10PM -0700, Steve Rae wrote:
> >> Hi Tom,
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:55:49AM -0700, Steve Rae wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Tom & Albert,
> >> >> Please approve the creation of a custodian repo for the Broadcom (arm) boards.
> >> >> ( Wolfgang already has my public key... )
> >> >>
> >> >> Wolfgang stated:
> >> >> > Before I can set up a new custodian repo, please post your
> >> >> > offer on the U-Boot mailing list -  I think the chips in question
> >> >> > belong to the ARM architecture (?), so both the ARM custodian (Albert)
> >> >> > and Tom should agree with the creation of such a new repo.  Once I
> >> >> > have their "go" it is only a matter of minutes.
> >> >
> >> > So, I do have a few BCM patches outstanding (and I'm build testing them
> >> > now).  ELC kicked -rc1 out a week (I'll be tagging it once I have this
> >> > series happy enough to push out with it).  Are you expecting the volume
> >> > of boards to increase?  Thanks!
> >>
> >> No -- only planning to add 2 new boards....
> >> It is just that with the current process, I waiting "months" to get
> >> patches applied - so Marek suggested that maybe I need to be a
> >> custodian, so that I can move things along....
> >
> > Er, months?  Sorry, I'm not seeing it right away at least:
> > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?submitter=64015&state=*
> > (and questions about how did .... get into state ... ? are answered with
> > "I took a stab at it").
> 
> how about:
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?submitter=64015&state=&q=&archive=&delegate=
> shows two outstanding from Feb 9  !!!
> (plus the three that I assume you are currently working on.....)

... yes, the gadget ones that wouldn't go through a BCM tree anyhow :)

But... I think I mis-assigned them in patchwork and it should be in my
queue anyhow, sorry.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20160411/34f7d1b5/attachment.sig>