[U-Boot] [PATCHv7 6/7] igep00x0: UBIize

[Heiko Schocher]

Hello Enric,

Am 25.01.2016 um 17:56 schrieb Enric Balletbo Serra:
> Hi Ladis,
>
> 2016-01-25 16:56 GMT+01:00 Ladislav Michl <ladis at linux-mips.org>:
>> Hi Enric,
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 08:26:23AM +0100, Enric Balletbo Serra wrote:
>>> The ROM boot on OMAP reads the first 4 blocks searching for the SPL,
>>> in production is a practice flash the SPL 4 times. OneNAND/NAND
>>> devices can have different block sizes and the OMAP ROM boot supports
>>> block sizes from 64KB to 512K. For IGEP boards in particular, at least
>>> there are boards that have block size of 128K and 256K. What I would
>>> meant here is set as default the mtdparts variable to reserve 2M for
>>> SPL, just to cover all the cases.
>>>
>>> mtdparts=mtdparts=gpmc-nand.0:2m(SPL),-(UBI)\0
>>
>> So far there was no ack or nack to yesterday's proposal making that
>> dynamic; Both boot ROM and ubispl code thinks in terms of eraseblocks,
>> only mtd needs fixed offset. So I'd like to see this offset calculated as
>> 4*block_size, not some "worst case" value...
>>
>>          ladis
>
> Your proposal looks good to me.
>

Are there any updates for this patch? The UBI SPL support is pending
for a while ...

I pushed my last (rebased to mainline) state to:

http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-ubi.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/ubi-spl

without the 2 igep00x0 board patches:

- [U-Boot,PATCHv7,6/7] igep00x0: UBIize
   https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/569214/

- [U-Boot,PATCHv4,7/7] igep00x0: Falcon mode
   https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/569215/

Could you please update your patches for the board support, so we can
push the UBI SPL support to mainline?

Thanks!

bye,
Heiko
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany