[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: dts: socfpga: fix DTC unit name warnings

[Marek Vasut]

On 04/15/2016 12:41 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Fix following DTC warnings for all socfpga boards:
> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /memory has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name
> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /soc/clkmgr at ffd04000/clocks/main_pll has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name
> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /soc/clkmgr at ffd04000/clocks/main_pll/mpuclk has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name
> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /soc/clkmgr at ffd04000/clocks/main_pll/mainclk has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name
> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /soc/clkmgr at ffd04000/clocks/main_pll/dbg_base_clk has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name
> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /soc/clkmgr at ffd04000/clocks/main_pll/main_qspi_clk has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name
> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /soc/clkmgr at ffd04000/clocks/main_pll/main_nand_sdmmc_clk has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name
> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /soc/clkmgr at ffd04000/clocks/main_pll/cfg_h2f_usr0_clk has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name
> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /soc/clkmgr at ffd04000/clocks/periph_pll has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name
> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /soc/clkmgr at ffd04000/clocks/periph_pll/emac0_clk has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name
> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /soc/clkmgr at ffd04000/clocks/periph_pll/emac1_clk has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name
> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /soc/clkmgr at ffd04000/clocks/periph_pll/per_qsi_clk has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name
> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /soc/clkmgr at ffd04000/clocks/periph_pll/per_nand_mmc_clk has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name
> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /soc/clkmgr at ffd04000/clocks/periph_pll/per_base_clk has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name
> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /soc/clkmgr at ffd04000/clocks/periph_pll/h2f_usr1_clk has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name
> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /soc/clkmgr at ffd04000/clocks/sdram_pll has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name
> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /soc/clkmgr at ffd04000/clocks/sdram_pll/ddr_dqs_clk has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name
> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /soc/clkmgr at ffd04000/clocks/sdram_pll/ddr_2x_dqs_clk has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name
> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /soc/clkmgr at ffd04000/clocks/sdram_pll/ddr_dq_clk has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name
> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /soc/clkmgr at ffd04000/clocks/sdram_pll/h2f_usr2_clk has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name
> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /soc/usbphy at 0 has a unit name, but no reg property

How come Linux isn't affected by this ?

> Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <hs at denx.de>
> ---
> This warnings pop up with the DTC compiler:
> $ /tmp/dtc/dtc -v
> Version: DTC 1.4.1-gbeef80b8
> 
> This fixes the compile warnings for:
> https://travis-ci.org/u-boot/u-boot/jobs/122880430
> 
> see:
> https://travis-ci.org/hsdenx/u-boot/jobs/123238779
> 
>  arch/arm/dts/skeleton.dtsi                     |  2 +-
>  arch/arm/dts/socfpga.dtsi                      | 40 +++++++++++++-------------
>  arch/arm/dts/socfpga_arria5_socdk.dts          |  2 +-
>  arch/arm/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_de0_nano_soc.dts |  2 +-
>  arch/arm/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_mcvevk.dts       |  2 +-
>  arch/arm/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_socdk.dts        |  2 +-
>  arch/arm/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_sockit.dts       |  2 +-
>  arch/arm/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_socrates.dts     |  2 +-
>  8 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/skeleton.dtsi b/arch/arm/dts/skeleton.dtsi
> index b41d241..a20da0a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/dts/skeleton.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/dts/skeleton.dtsi
> @@ -9,5 +9,5 @@
>  	#size-cells = <1>;
>  	chosen { };
>  	aliases { };
> -	memory { device_type = "memory"; reg = <0 0>; };
> +	memory at 0 { device_type = "memory"; reg = <0 0>; };
>  };

Can you split this into skeleton.dtsi patch and socfpga-only patch?
That'd help containing the changes.

Thanks!

Best regards,
Marek Vasut