[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: dts: socfpga: fix DTC unit name warnings

[Marek Vasut]

On 04/18/2016 01:20 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Hello Marek,
> 
> Am 18.04.2016 um 12:36 schrieb Marek Vasut:
>> On 04/18/2016 06:55 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>>> Hello Marek,
>>>
>>> Am 15.04.2016 um 16:18 schrieb Marek Vasut:
>>>> On 04/15/2016 12:41 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>>>>> Fix following DTC warnings for all socfpga boards:
>>>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /memory has a reg or ranges
>>>>> property, but no unit name
>>>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node
>>>>> /soc/clkmgr at ffd04000/clocks/main_pll has a reg or ranges property,
>>>>> but no unit name
>>>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node
>>>>> /soc/clkmgr at ffd04000/clocks/main_pll/mpuclk has a reg or ranges
>>>>> property, but no unit name
>>>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node
>>>>> /soc/clkmgr at ffd04000/clocks/main_pll/mainclk has a reg or ranges
>>>>> property, but no unit name
>>>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node
>>>>> /soc/clkmgr at ffd04000/clocks/main_pll/dbg_base_clk has a reg or ranges
>>>>> property, but no unit name
>>>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node
>>>>> /soc/clkmgr at ffd04000/clocks/main_pll/main_qspi_clk has a reg or
>>>>> ranges property, but no unit name
>>>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node
>>>>> /soc/clkmgr at ffd04000/clocks/main_pll/main_nand_sdmmc_clk has a reg or
>>>>> ranges property, but no unit name
>>>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node
>>>>> /soc/clkmgr at ffd04000/clocks/main_pll/cfg_h2f_usr0_clk has a reg or
>>>>> ranges property, but no unit name
>>>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node
>>>>> /soc/clkmgr at ffd04000/clocks/periph_pll has a reg or ranges property,
>>>>> but no unit name
>>>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node
>>>>> /soc/clkmgr at ffd04000/clocks/periph_pll/emac0_clk has a reg or ranges
>>>>> property, but no unit name
>>>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node
>>>>> /soc/clkmgr at ffd04000/clocks/periph_pll/emac1_clk has a reg or ranges
>>>>> property, but no unit name
>>>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node
>>>>> /soc/clkmgr at ffd04000/clocks/periph_pll/per_qsi_clk has a reg or
>>>>> ranges property, but no unit name
>>>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node
>>>>> /soc/clkmgr at ffd04000/clocks/periph_pll/per_nand_mmc_clk has a reg or
>>>>> ranges property, but no unit name
>>>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node
>>>>> /soc/clkmgr at ffd04000/clocks/periph_pll/per_base_clk has a reg or
>>>>> ranges property, but no unit name
>>>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node
>>>>> /soc/clkmgr at ffd04000/clocks/periph_pll/h2f_usr1_clk has a reg or
>>>>> ranges property, but no unit name
>>>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node
>>>>> /soc/clkmgr at ffd04000/clocks/sdram_pll has a reg or ranges property,
>>>>> but no unit name
>>>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node
>>>>> /soc/clkmgr at ffd04000/clocks/sdram_pll/ddr_dqs_clk has a reg or ranges
>>>>> property, but no unit name
>>>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node
>>>>> /soc/clkmgr at ffd04000/clocks/sdram_pll/ddr_2x_dqs_clk has a reg or
>>>>> ranges property, but no unit name
>>>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node
>>>>> /soc/clkmgr at ffd04000/clocks/sdram_pll/ddr_dq_clk has a reg or ranges
>>>>> property, but no unit name
>>>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node
>>>>> /soc/clkmgr at ffd04000/clocks/sdram_pll/h2f_usr2_clk has a reg or
>>>>> ranges property, but no unit name
>>>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /soc/usbphy at 0 has a unit name,
>>>>> but no reg property
>>>>
>>>> How come Linux isn't affected by this ?
>>>
>>> I think linux is also affected!
>>
>> You might want to bring it up on the LKML, like Pavel suggested.
> 
> Do we have the same DTS as linux?
> (If so, isn;t it a bad idea to hold the files on 2 places?)

The DTS should be very similar I hope. U-Boot has QSPI nodes and the
u-boot,dm-pre-reloc properties.

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut