[U-Boot] [PATCH 02/60] mmc: tegra: move pad init into MMC driver

Stephen Warren swarren at wwwdotorg.org
Tue Apr 26 01:11:16 CEST 2016


On 04/25/2016 05:05 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 04:43:34PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 04/25/2016 04:37 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:52:53PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>>> Dear Stephen Warren,
>>>>
>>>> In message <571E733A.1060208 at wwwdotorg.org> you wrote:
>>> [snip]
>>>>> Unfortunately we've (NVIDIA at least) been a little lax making sure the
>>>>> NVIDIA copyright messages are kept up-to-date when editing files, hence
>>>>> why this series had to change a lot of them for the first time recently.
>>>>> If we went back and re-wrote all of git history paying strict attention
>>>>> to the copyright notice dates and formatting, I imagine the set of
>>>>> copyright-related changes in this series would be much smaller.
>>>
>>> I'm quoting Wolfgang's email here, but, yes, keeping the copyright
>>> notices correct is important.  Now, what do you mean by would be
>>> smaller?
>>
>> Personally I want to spend my time coding rather than dealing with
>> licensing. As such, it's easy to forget to update the dates in
>> copyright notices when changing files, or to put the correct
>> information into new files when creating new ones (often by just
>> cutting/pasting some other file with similar issues). If we had done
>> that 100% correctly in every commit across history, my inclination
>> is that more files would already have an NVIDIA copyright message,
>> and/or already have 2016 in the date, and hence this series wouldn't
>> include an edit to those messages since they'd already be
>> up-to-date. Still, I have no searched all history to confirm that;
>> it's just my gut instinct.
>
> Right, OK.  So you're saying you may, in some cases, be adding 2016 to
> files you haven't touched this year yet?

Yes, I'm sure there's a mix.


More information about the U-Boot mailing list