[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 27/27] RFC: sunxi: Enable SPL FIT support

[Tom Rini]

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 03:12:19PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> On 28.4.2016 15:07, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:44:50AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> >> Hi Simon and Tom,
> >>
> >> On 23.2.2016 06:55, Simon Glass wrote:
> >>> Enable SPL FIT support for the Linksprite pcDuino3 as an example of how this
> >>> feature is used.
> >>>
> >>> This is only for demonstration purposes and is not to be applied.
> >>> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> >>> ---
> >>>
> >>> Changes in v2: None
> >>>
> >>>  arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/board.c      | 5 +++++
> >>>  configs/Linksprite_pcDuino3_defconfig | 4 ++++
> >>>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> I have played with SPL_FIT support and find some things
> >> First of all
> >> "mkimage: Support placing data outside the FIT"
> >> (722ebc8f84d5bccd2e70fad1079a0dd40cceddec)
> >> is missing description in usage function to see what -E options does.
> >>
> >> Then I have found a problem with fit address calculation because it has
> >> to be aligned.
> >> I have sent an RFC for it
> >> "SPL: FIT: Align loading address for header"
> >>
> >> I have also added support for ram load for FIT - please review.
> >> "SPL: FIT: Enable SPL_FIT_LOAD in RAM based boot mode"
> > 
> > I think these are reasonable.
> > 
> >> And also for SD fat based images.
> >> "SPL: FIT: Enable SPL_FIT_LOAD for sd bootmode for fat partions"
> > 
> > Ug, sorry.  You missed the series from Lokesh that added a bunch more
> > features along those lines.  I didn't pull them in since it was past the
> > merge window but will for the next release.
> 
> Ah ok. Will look.
> 
> > 
> >> Is there any plan to support falcon mode?
> >> Also I see kind of interesting to have one fit image with ATF, Secure
> >> OS, bitstreams and U-Boot and Linux kernel + dtbs
> >> Currently spl_load_simple_fit() seems to me expecting to blindly read
> >> the first fit partition and say this is u-boot and then based
> >> configuration description choose dtb.
> >>
> >> Do you have any plan to get even u-boot image from configurations instead?
> >> The we should get a support for loadables.
> > 
> > Well, the first itch I needed scratched was supporting many similar
> > platforms in DM+DT from a single binary, and that's what's there today.
> > So long as we can do things in a clean way, all of these other use cases
> > sound interesting and clearly useful to some people, so I don't object.
> 
> 
> How do you identify platform you are running at?

In these cases we know there is an I2C EEPROM with information in a
given format so we can go from there.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20160428/b9ef1afd/attachment.sig>