[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5] i2c: tegra: add standardized clk/reset API support
Stephen Warren
swarren at wwwdotorg.org
Mon Aug 1 17:24:28 CEST 2016
On 07/31/2016 07:02 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On 27 July 2016 at 15:48, Stephen Warren <swarren at wwwdotorg.org> wrote:
>> From: Bryan Wu <pengw at nvidia.com>
>>
>> clk/reset API was tested on T186 platform and previous chip like
>> T210/T124 will still use the old APIs.
>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/tegra_i2c.c b/drivers/i2c/tegra_i2c.c
>> @@ -30,7 +35,12 @@ enum i2c_type {
>> /* Information about i2c controller */
>> struct i2c_bus {
>> int id;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_TEGRA186
>> + struct reset_ctl reset_ctl;
>> + struct clk clk;
>> +#else
>> enum periph_id periph_id;
>> +#endif
>
> This doesn't seem right - the drivers should be SoC-independent at compile-time.
Same comment as before; there's not yet a common clock/reset API
implementation except on the latest SoC.
>> @@ -370,7 +437,12 @@ static int tegra_i2c_probe(struct udevice *dev)
>> i2c_init_controller(i2c_bus);
>> debug("%s: controller bus %d at %p, periph_id %d, speed %d: ",
>> is_dvc ? "dvc" : "i2c", dev->seq, i2c_bus->regs,
>> - i2c_bus->periph_id, i2c_bus->speed);
>> +#ifndef CONFIG_TEGRA186
>> + i2c_bus->periph_id,
>
> Probably the concept of periph_id can go away now? Perhaps this driver
> needs a clean-up?
It's still needed for the legacy APIs on older SoCs.
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list