[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/5] pci: tegra: port to standard clock/reset/pwr domain APIs

Stephen Warren swarren at wwwdotorg.org
Thu Aug 4 20:52:49 CEST 2016


On 08/03/2016 07:16 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On 1 August 2016 at 09:22, Stephen Warren <swarren at wwwdotorg.org> wrote:
>> On 07/31/2016 07:02 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Stephen,
>>>
>>> On 27 July 2016 at 15:48, Stephen Warren <swarren at wwwdotorg.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> From: Stephen Warren <swarren at nvidia.com>
>>>>
>>>> Tegra186 supports the new standard clock, reset, and power domain APIs.
>>>> Older Tegra SoCs still use custom APIs. Enhance the Tegra PCIe driver so
>>>> that it can operate with either set of APIs.
>>>>
>>>> On Tegra186, the BPMP handles all aspects of PCIe PHY (UPHY) programming.
>>>> Consequently, this logic is disabled too.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren at nvidia.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> This whole series builds on the other Tegra186 series that I just sent.
>>>>
>>>>  drivers/pci/Kconfig     |   1 +
>>>>  drivers/pci/pci_tegra.c | 154
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>>>  2 files changed, 150 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/Kconfig
>>>> index 26aa2b0930a0..669e37bb5dc5 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/pci/Kconfig
>>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/Kconfig
>>>> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ config PCI_SANDBOX
>>>>  config PCI_TEGRA
>>>>         bool "Tegra PCI support"
>>>>         depends on TEGRA
>>>> +       depends on (TEGRA186 && POWER_DOMAIN) || (!TEGRA186)
>>>>         help
>>>>           Enable support for the PCIe controller found on some
>>>> generations of
>>>>           Tegra. Tegra20 has 2 root ports with a total of 4 lanes,
>>>> Tegra30 has
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci_tegra.c b/drivers/pci/pci_tegra.c
>>>> index 352cdef56ab4..a6785ad0bbee 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/pci/pci_tegra.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci_tegra.c
>>>> @@ -13,22 +13,26 @@
>>>>  #define pr_fmt(fmt) "tegra-pcie: " fmt
>>>>
>>>>  #include <common.h>
>>>> +#include <clk.h>
>>>>  #include <dm.h>
>>>>  #include <errno.h>
>>>>  #include <fdtdec.h>
>>>>  #include <malloc.h>
>>>>  #include <pci.h>
>>>> +#include <power-domain.h>
>>>> +#include <reset.h>
>>>>
>>>>  #include <asm/io.h>
>>>>  #include <asm/gpio.h>
>>>>
>>>> +#include <linux/list.h>
>>>> +
>>>> +#ifndef CONFIG_TEGRA186
>>>>  #include <asm/arch/clock.h>
>>>>  #include <asm/arch/powergate.h>
>>>>  #include <asm/arch-tegra/xusb-padctl.h>
>>>> -
>>>> -#include <linux/list.h>
>>>> -
>>>>  #include <dt-bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-tegra-xusb.h>
>>>> +#endif
>>>>
>>>>  DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
>>>>
>>>> @@ -103,6 +107,9 @@ DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
>>>>  #define  AFI_PCIE_CONFIG_SM2TMS0_XBAR_CONFIG_222       (0x1 << 20)
>>>>  #define  AFI_PCIE_CONFIG_SM2TMS0_XBAR_CONFIG_X4_X1     (0x1 << 20)
>>>>  #define  AFI_PCIE_CONFIG_SM2TMS0_XBAR_CONFIG_411       (0x2 << 20)
>>>> +#define  AFI_PCIE_CONFIG_SM2TMS0_XBAR_CONFIG_T186_401  (0x0 << 20)
>>>> +#define  AFI_PCIE_CONFIG_SM2TMS0_XBAR_CONFIG_T186_211  (0x1 << 20)
>>>> +#define  AFI_PCIE_CONFIG_SM2TMS0_XBAR_CONFIG_T186_111  (0x2 << 20)
>>>>
>>>>  #define AFI_FUSE                       0x104
>>>>  #define  AFI_FUSE_PCIE_T0_GEN2_DIS     (1 << 2)
>>>> @@ -110,6 +117,7 @@ DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
>>>>  #define AFI_PEX0_CTRL                  0x110
>>>>  #define AFI_PEX1_CTRL                  0x118
>>>>  #define AFI_PEX2_CTRL                  0x128
>>>> +#define AFI_PEX2_CTRL_T186             0x19c
>>>>  #define  AFI_PEX_CTRL_RST              (1 << 0)
>>>>  #define  AFI_PEX_CTRL_CLKREQ_EN                (1 << 1)
>>>>  #define  AFI_PEX_CTRL_REFCLK_EN                (1 << 3)
>>>> @@ -173,6 +181,7 @@ enum tegra_pci_id {
>>>>         TEGRA30_PCIE,
>>>>         TEGRA124_PCIE,
>>>>         TEGRA210_PCIE,
>>>> +       TEGRA186_PCIE,
>>>>  };
>>>>
>>>>  struct tegra_pcie_port {
>>>> @@ -189,6 +198,7 @@ struct tegra_pcie_soc {
>>>>         unsigned int num_ports;
>>>>         unsigned long pads_pll_ctl;
>>>>         unsigned long tx_ref_sel;
>>>> +       unsigned long afi_pex2_ctrl;
>>>>         u32 pads_refclk_cfg0;
>>>>         u32 pads_refclk_cfg1;
>>>>         bool has_pex_clkreq_en;
>>>> @@ -209,7 +219,17 @@ struct tegra_pcie {
>>>>         unsigned long xbar;
>>>>
>>>>         const struct tegra_pcie_soc *soc;
>>>> +
>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_TEGRA186
>>>> +       struct clk clk_afi;
>>>> +       struct clk clk_pex;
>>>> +       struct reset_ctl reset_afi;
>>>> +       struct reset_ctl reset_pex;
>>>> +       struct reset_ctl reset_pcie_x;
>>>> +       struct power_domain pwrdom;
>>>> +#else
>>>
>>>
>>> Eek. This is a compile-time driver configuration. Can you use the
>>> device tree compatible string to detect which to use?
>>
>>
>> No. The legacy APIs are simply not available (not compiled in) on the newer
>> SoCs, so there must be a compile-time condition.
>>
>> It is theoretically possible to convert all the old SoCs to the new APIs so
>> that this conditional goes away in the future, but we don't have that work
>> scheduled at present.
>
> What did you do with Linux?

We lucked out and life was a bit simpler:

When we started adding Tegra support, there was already a standard clock 
API header, albeit with an entirely separate implementation for each 
SoC. When the common clock framework/core appeared, it maintained this 
same API so drivers weren't affected, except for a change in a #include 
filename.

As far as converting the clock driver from a standalone/custom 
implementation to being based on the common clock framework/core, life 
was much easier. At that time, we only supported 2 Tegra SoC generations 
and many fewer boards and drivers, and so significantly less testing was 
required for the converted implementation. Many SoC generations, board, 
and drivers were only written once the new clock implementation was in 
place, so never needed conversion.

Tegra started out with a completely custom reset API and implementation. 
When Tegra converted from its custom standalone clock implementation to 
the common clock framework/core, that same API was re-implemented using 
the new clock code (as you know, clocks and resets on Tegra are very 
closely tied), and so there was no effect on drivers.

Later, we converted to the new reset API/framework/core. At this point, 
we did support 4 SoC generations and many more boards. However, IIRC 
during this time, there was a huge focus on converting to standard APIs, 
and a lull in new SoC and board support, so there was time to spend on 
large-scale conversions; they didn't take time away from other work 
required to support new SoCs/boards. This conversion implemented the new 
standard reset for all SoCs first, converted all drivers to use the new 
API roughly at once, and then removed the old API.

So we got away without ifdefs.

In U-Boot, we now support many more SoCs, boards, and perhaps even 
drivers, so a "convert everything at once" approach is quite a lot more 
work than it was in the kernel, especially on the clock/reset driver 
implementation side. Equally, to be honest, my primary focus is 
currently on adding Tegra186 support at the moment. Given we needed a 
completely new clock/reset/... implementation anyway due to the 
existence of the BPMP, it was a no-brainer to create and/or use the new 
standard clock/reset/... APIs for Tegra186, rather than basing the new 
implementation on the old custom APIs. However, converting all the other 
SoCs/boards first is just going to delay any forward progress on 
Tegra186 and lead to a mega series of code conversions that I'd rather 
avoid doing all at once. Adding these ifdefs, allows incremental forward 
progress to be made pretty easily. They should be removed when older SoC 
generations are converted to the new APIs, so everything is unified 
again. Granted, I have no definite timescale for that at present.


More information about the U-Boot mailing list