[U-Boot] [PATCH 02/14] spl: mmc: Fix build without LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT

[Jaehoon Chung]

Hi Marek,

On 11/28/2016 11:53 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 11/28/2016 03:33 AM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
>> On 11/27/2016 05:58 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On 11/26/2016 09:45 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 11:32:23PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>>> If CONFIG_SPL_LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT is undefined, the following error
>>>>> will happen, so fix it.
>>>>>
>>>>> In file included from common/spl/spl_mmc.c:11:0:
>>>>> common/spl/spl_mmc.c: In function ‘spl_mmc_load_image’:
>>>>> include/spl.h:18:30: error: label at end of compound statement
>>>>>  #define MMCSD_MODE_UNDEFINED 0
>>>>>                               ^
>>>>> common/spl/spl_mmc.c:335:7: note: in expansion of macro ‘MMCSD_MODE_UNDEFINED’
>>>>>   case MMCSD_MODE_UNDEFINED:
>>>>>        ^
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de>
>>>>> Cc: Pantelis Antoniou <panto at antoniou-consulting.com>
>>>>> Cc: Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  common/spl/spl_mmc.c | 4 +++-
>>>>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/common/spl/spl_mmc.c b/common/spl/spl_mmc.c
>>>>> index 0b681c2..43c1030 100644
>>>>> --- a/common/spl/spl_mmc.c
>>>>> +++ b/common/spl/spl_mmc.c
>>>>> @@ -343,10 +343,12 @@ static int spl_mmc_load_image(struct spl_image_info *spl_image,
>>>>>  
>>>>>  		break;
>>>>>  	case MMCSD_MODE_UNDEFINED:
>>>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT
>>>>>  	default:
>>>>> +		{
>>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPL_LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT
>>>>>  		puts("spl: mmc: wrong boot mode\n");
>>>>>  #endif
>>>>> +		}
>>>>>  	}
>>>>>  
>>>>>  	return err;
>>>>
>>>> I think we have something slightly off here.  Is
>>>> CONFIG_SPL_SERIAL_SUPPORT also enabled?  That would turn this into a
>>>> no-op as puts becomes a do { } while(0), if disabled.  So I think we
>>>> should just remove the ifdef here.
>>>
>>> No, series does not fit into SPL on this platform.
>>
>> I don't know..but i remembered that i suggested about putting just "break;" end of bracket.
>> how about?
> 
> Sure, that works too.

I didn't see this patch in your next version, right?

Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung

>