[U-Boot] [U-Boot, 1/1] arm: mach-omap2: Fix secure file generation

Tom Rini trini at konsulko.com
Fri Dec 9 22:30:27 CET 2016


On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 02:24:32PM -0600, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
> On 12/09/2016 02:10 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 02:05:29PM -0600, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
> >> On 12/09/2016 01:59 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 04:48:07PM -0600, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> When TI_SECURE_DEV_PKG is not defined we warn that the file '*_HS' was
> >>>> not generated but generate an unsigned one anyway. When TI_SECURE_DEV_PKG
> >>>> is exported and the user re-builds, make will detect this file as
> >>>> unchangedand and so assume it does not need to be re-generated. This
> >>>> causes it to pack unsigned files. Fix this by not generating these
> >>>> fake unsigned *_HS files.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis <afd at ti.com>
> >>>> Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/config_secure.mk | 4 ++--
> >>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/config_secure.mk b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/config_secure.mk
> >>>> index 1122439..33c7059 100644
> >>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/config_secure.mk
> >>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/config_secure.mk
> >>>> @@ -35,12 +35,12 @@ cmd_omapsecureimg = $(TI_SECURE_DEV_PKG)/scripts/secure-binary-image.sh \
> >>>>  else
> >>>>  cmd_omapsecureimg = echo "WARNING:" \
> >>>>  	"$(TI_SECURE_DEV_PKG)/scripts/secure-binary-image.sh not found." \
> >>>> -	"$@ was NOT created!"; cp $< $@
> >>>> +	"$@ was NOT created!";
> >>>>  endif
> >>>>  else
> >>>>  cmd_omapsecureimg = echo "WARNING: TI_SECURE_DEV_PKG environment" \
> >>>>  	"variable must be defined for TI secure devices." \
> >>>> -	"$@ was NOT created!"; cp $< $@
> >>>> +	"$@ was NOT created!";
> >>>>  endif
> >>>>  endif
> >>>
> >>> OK, but now that I build test this (without the tools present) this is a
> >>> NAK.  The root problem is that if we don't make that dummy file we then:
> >>>        arm:  +   am57xx_hs_evm
> >>> +(am57xx_hs_evm) ./tools/mkimage: Can't open u-boot-nodtb_HS.bin: No such file or directory
> >>> +(am57xx_hs_evm) ./tools/mkimage: failed to build FIT
> >>> +(am57xx_hs_evm) make[1]: *** [u-boot_HS.img] Error 1
> >>> +(am57xx_hs_evm) make: *** [sub-make] Error 2
> >>
> >> Is this not okay? build *should* fail if TI_SECURE_DEV_PKG is not
> >> defined. You cannot sign images that *need* to be signed to work on this
> >> platform, making a fake un-bootable image instead of failing is a hack
> >> and it confuses the make system when you do put the signing tool in-place.
> > 
> > Well, I suppose this is a valid question.  I run into it failing as I
> > (and travis-ci) build all ARM targets.  Maybe we can have the build not
> > happen (and echo a Warning) and then not invoke mkimage later on if the
> > env isn't right?
> 
> For test building you can export TI_SECURE_DEV_PKG to point to a dummy
> signing tool which just runs cp $1 $2. For real world building this tool
> is needed just as much as the compiler, if you don't have it you will
> not build working images, build needs to fail here.

Hmmm, OK.  But can we not automate that based on TI_SECURE_DEV_PKG being
unset?

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20161209/5984f608/attachment.sig>


More information about the U-Boot mailing list