[U-Boot] [PATCH] sf: ids: Correct Micron n25q128 flags

[Phil Edworthy]

Hi Jagan,

On 21 December 2016 11:21, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Phil Edworthy
> <phil.edworthy at renesas.com> wrote:
> > On 21 December 2016 11:10, Jagan Teki wrote:
> >> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Phil Edworthy
> >> <phil.edworthy at renesas.com> wrote:
> >> > The n25q128 devices support 4K erase.
> >>
> >> It's OK, but go with 64K erase.
> > Sorry, I don’t understand your comment.
> > Do you mean we should stick with 64K erase?
> > If so, then what about all the other Micron devices that have SECT_4K?
> 
> It's because we have tested 64K on these parts and it's fine why can't
> we move 4K because 64K look faster, did you find any issue with 64K on
> this specific part?
No, I didn’t find any problems with it at 64K erase.
As you say, erasing 64K is much faster than 16 x 4K erase. So should we
move the other Micron parts to 64K?

Thanks
Phil