[U-Boot] [PATCH 00/14] EFI payload / application support v2
Simon Glass
sjg at chromium.org
Mon Feb 1 03:52:51 CET 2016
Hi Alexander,
On 31 January 2016 at 14:43, Alexander Graf <agraf at suse.de> wrote:
>
>
> On 01/31/2016 04:17 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>
>> Hi Alexander,
>>
>> On 14 January 2016 at 22:06, Alexander Graf <agraf at suse.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> This is my Christmas present for my openSUSE friends :).
>>>
>>> U-Boot is a great project for embedded devices. However, convincing
>>> everyone involved that only for "a few oddball ARM devices" we need to
>>> support different configuration formats from grub2 when all other
>>> platforms
>>> (PPC, System Z, x86) are standardized on a single format is a nightmare.
>>
>> Well some might argue that grub2 and UEFI are their own nightmares :-)
>
>
> They are, but they are the same nightmare everyone else is dreaming ;).
>
>
>>
>>> So we started to explore alternatives. At first, people tried to get
>>> grub2 running using the u-boot api interface. However, FWIW that one
>>> doesn't support relocations, so you need to know where to link grub2 to
>>> at compile time. It also seems to be broken more often than not. And on
>>> top of it all, it's a one-off interface, so yet another thing to
>>> maintain.
>>
>> The API interface is mostly for closed-source work I think.
>>
>>> That led to a nifty idea. What if we can just implement the EFI
>>> application
>>> protocol on top of U-Boot? Then we could compile a single grub2 binary
>>> for
>>> uEFI based systems and U-Boot based systems and as soon as that one's
>>> loaded,
>>> everything looks and feels (almost) the same.
>>>
>>> This patch set is the result of pursuing this endeavor.
>>>
>>> - I am successfully able to run grub2 and Linux EFI binaries with this
>>> code.
>>> - When enabled, the resulting U-Boot binary only grows by ~10kb,
>>> so it's very light weight.
>>> - It works on 32bit ARM and AArch64.
>>> - All storage devices are directly accessible
>>> - No EFI variables
>>> - Removable media booting (search for /efi/boot/boota{a64,arm}.efi)
>>>
>>> Of course, there are still a few things one could do on top:
>>>
>>> - Improve disk media detection (don't scan, use what information we
>>> have)
>>> - Add EFI variable support using NVRAM
>>> - Add GFX support
>>> - Make EFI Shell work ;)
>>> - Network device support
>>> - Support for payload exit
>>>
>>> But so far, I'm very happy with the state of the patches. They completely
>>> eliminate potential arguments against U-Boot internally and give users
>>> the
>>> chance to run with the same level of comfort on all firmware types.
>>
>> I'd suggest creating a README with the above info. The cover letter
>> will vanish pretty fast. Perhaps also update README.efi with this new
>> option.
>
>
> Good idea.
>
>>
>> Another thing you could list is efi_set_watchdog_timer().
>
>
> What about it exactly? That it's not supported atm?
Yes.
>
>>
>>> Version 2 was successfully tested to boot grub2 and Linux from there on a
>>> HiKey (AArch64, dcache disabled) and on a BeagleBone Black.
>>
>> Do you have a UEFI image for BBB that I can put on an SD card or otherwise
>> boot?
>
>
> Phew, I hand-crafted one to play around with. You can use the hip04d01 image
> from
>
> http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/devel:/ARM:/Factory:/Contrib:/HIP04D01/images/openSUSE-Tumbleweed-ARM-JeOS-hip04d01.armv7l.install.tar.xz
>
> Just extract the tar.xz, to get to the actual image .xz file.
>
> That image obviously has an incorrect kernel for the BBB, but everything up
> to grub2 should work with it.
I'm not sure what file to use. I found a file with a .12.1 extension
which I tried to dd to a uSD card but it did not boot.
Do you have an ARM grub binary (in EFI format)? II could test with
just that piece. tried building grub but it says cross-compiling
isn't recommended, and I got an error about a missing
../include/grub/machine/kernel.h.
>
> My plan was to slowly move all openSUSE arm targets that use our own u-boot
> binaries to EFI once this patch set goes in ;).
BTW out of interest how come SUSE doesn't use the same distro boot
thing as other distributions?
>
>> For now I've had a play with Minnowboard, which is x86. The main thing
>> I noticed is that the API function implements should have EFIAPI on
>> them also.
>
>
> Yes :). I didn't expect anyone to actually care about running this on x86
> which is the only architecture that has different calling conventions for
> EFI. I'm very pleasantly surprised that you are interested and since you
> already have a patch to add them, I guess you can as well just post that
> once the base support is in :).
OK. I suppose because EFIAPI is empty on ARM it doesn't matter. But
strictly speaking the declaration should match the implementation.
U-Boot mostly uses FIT which provides secure boot and it can boot both
32- and 64-bit kernels directly. But there is still the odd setup.bin
thing Linux uses.
Perhaps my main interest is fiddling with UEFI without having to use
its code base. :-)
>
>> I'll make a few other comments on the patches. But overall
>> it seems to function and I think your implementation is nice.
>
>
> Thanks :)
>
>>
>> I was able to get grub to boot but it just says 'Welcome to GRUB!'
>> and then 'error: disk ',gpt4' not found'. I'm not sure what that
>> means.
>
>
> It might mean memory corruption. I'm not sure where from though :). It could
> also mean register clobbering.
>
>
>>
>>
>> U-Boot 2016.01-00860-geb4b602-dirty (Jan 31 2016 - 08:02:54 -0700)
>>
>> CPU: x86_64, vendor Intel, device 30673h
>> DRAM: 2 GiB
>> efi_runtime_relocate: Relocating to offset=7ba5d000
>> MMC: ValleyView SDHCI: 0, ValleyView SDHCI: 1
>> SF: Detected W25Q64DW with page size 256 Bytes, erase size 4 KiB, total 8
>> MiB
>> *** Warning - bad CRC, using default environment
>>
>> Video: 1280x1024x16
>> Model: Intel Minnowboard Max
>> SF: Detected W25Q64DW with page size 256 Bytes, erase size 4 KiB, total 8
>> MiB
>> SCSI: SATA link 0 timeout.
>> Target spinup took 0 ms.
>> AHCI 0001.0300 32 slots 2 ports 3 Gbps 0x3 impl SATA mode
>> flags: 64bit ncq stag pm led clo pio slum part sxs
>> scanning bus for devices...
>> Device 0: (1:0) Vendor: ATA Prod.: ADATA SP310 Rev: 5.2
>> Type: Hard Disk
>> Capacity: 30533.8 MB = 29.8 GB (62533296 x 512)
>> Found 1 device(s).
>> Net:
>> Warning: eth_rtl8169 using MAC address from ROM
>> eth0: eth_rtl8169
>> Hit any key to stop autoboot: 0
>> reading grubia32.efi
>> 85504 bytes read in 16 ms (5.1 MiB/s)
>> ## Starting EFI application at 0x00010000 ...
>> WARNING: No device tree loaded, expect boot to fail
>> Scanning disks on scsi...
>> Scanning disks on usb...
>> Scanning disks on mmc...
>> Card did not respond to voltage select!
>> MMC Device 2 not found
>> MMC Device 3 not found
>> Found 2 disks
>> do_bootefi_exec:134 Jumping to 0x72857400
>> EFI: Entry efi_open_protocol(7bab8c18, 728609a0, 7b857ab8, 7bab8c18,
>> 00000000, 0x2)
>> efi_open_protocol: Found protocol handler loaded_image0
>> EFI: Exit 0
>> EFI: Entry efi_locate_protocol(72860990, 00000000, 7b857ac8)
>> EFI: Exit 0
>> EFI: Entry efi_cin_get_mode(7baa79cc, 7b857af8, 00000000, 00000000)
>> EFI: Exit 0
>> EFI: Entry efi_locate_protocol(72860990, 00000000, 7b857aa8)
>> EFI: Exit 0
>> EFI: Entry efi_cin_get_mode(7baa79cc, 7b857ad8, 00000000, 00000000)
>> EFI: Exit 0
>> EFI: Entry efi_cout_enable_cursor(7baa79d8, 1)
>> EFI: Exit 80000003
>> EFI: Entry efi_allocate_pages(1, 2, 0x6, 7b857a74)
>> EFI: Exit 0
>> EFI: Entry efi_get_memory_map(7b857b04, 7286c000, 7b857a64, 7b857b08,
>> 7b857a68)
>> EFI: Exit 0
>> EFI: Entry efi_allocate_pages(2, 2, 0x1ca15, 7b857a74)
>> EFI: Exit 0
>> EFI: Entry efi_free_pages(7286c000, 0x6)
>> EFI: Exit 0
>> EFI: Entry efi_set_watchdog_timer(0, 0x0, 0, 00000000)
>> EFI: App called into unimplemented function efi_set_watchdog_timer
>> EFI: Exit 80000003
>> EFI: Exit 80000003
>> EFI: App called into unimplemented function efi_set_watchdog_timer
>> EFI: Exit 80000003
>> EFI: Entry efi_locate_handle(2, 72860980, 00000000, 7b857a88, 72856fe0)
>> EFI: Exit 0
>> EFI: Entry efi_open_protocol(7b863108, 728609b0, 7b857a78, 7bab8c18,
>> 00000000, 0x2)
>> efi_open_protocol: Found protocol handler open_dp
>> efi_disk_open_dp
>> EFI: Exit 0
>> EFI: Entry efi_open_protocol(7b863108, 72860980, 7b857a98, 7bab8c18,
>> 00000000, 0x2)
>> efi_open_protocol: Found protocol handler open_block
>> efi_disk_open_block
>> EFI: Exit 0
>> EFI: Entry efi_open_protocol(7b8631d8, 728609b0, 7b857a78, 7bab8c18,
>> 00000000, 0x2)
>> efi_open_protocol: Found protocol handler open_dp
>> efi_disk_open_dp
>> EFI: Exit 0
>> EFI: Entry efi_open_protocol(7b8631d8, 72860980, 7b857a98, 7bab8c18,
>> 00000000, 0x2)
>> efi_open_protocol: Found protocol handler open_block
>> efi_disk_open_block
>> EFI: Exit 0
>> EFI: Entry efi_cout_set_attribute(7baa79d8, 70)
>> EFI: Exit 80000003
>> Welcome to GRUB!
>>
>> EFI: Entry efi_cout_set_attribute(7baa79d8, 7)
>> EFI: Exit 80000003
>> EFI: Entry efi_open_protocol(7bab8c18, 728609a0, 7b857ad8, 7bab8c18,
>> 00000000, 0x2)
>> efi_open_protocol: Found protocol handler loaded_image0
>> EFI: Exit 0
>> EFI: Entry efi_open_protocol(7bab8bd0, 728609b0, 7b857a78, 7bab8c18,
>> 00000000, 0x2)
>> efi_open_protocol: Found protocol handler bootefi0
>> EFI: Exit 0
>> error: disk `,gpt4' not found.
>> Entering rescue mode...
>> grub rescue>
>
>
> Does grub see the hard disks? What happens when you do ls (hd,<TAB>? Also,
> try the ls command but first do set debug=all to get grub internal debugging
> enabled too.
>
>>
>>
>> I suppose my grub could be wrong. If you can point me to one that I
>> should use I could try again. I pushed your tree (rebased to mainline)
>> plus my messing-around patch to u-boot-x86/efi-working.
>>
>> It would be good to get this series applied soon.
>
>
> Awesome.
>
> I'm currently rewriting the memory map code, making it more robust, easy to
> understand and extensible for modules that may want to register runtime
> service mmio regions.
>
> Once that works and I have all of Leif's comments sorted out, I'll post v3.
Sounds good.
>
>
> Alex
>
Regards,
Simon
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list