[U-Boot] ls1021aqds_nor_lpuart_ boards

[Bin Meng]

On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Fabio Estevam <festevam at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Stefano Babic <sbabic at denx.de> wrote:
>> Hi Bhuvanchandra,
>>
>> your applied patch:
>>
>> commit 5160def267739518950e8e3bb78e0e6c3941cb3e
>> Author: Bhuvanchandra DV <bhuvanchandra.dv at toradex.com>
>> Date:   Wed Jan 27 10:31:52 2016 +0530
>>
>>     dm: lpuart: Drop the legacy code
>>
>> braks ls1021aqds_*nor_lpuart. Tom has gently merged my PR, but this
>> should be fixed. In fact, CONFIG_DM and CONFIG_DM_SERIAL are not set for
>> these boards (setting them, build is fine):
>>
>> For example, for ls1021aqds_nor_lpuart:
>> diff --git a/configs/ls1021aqds_nor_lpuart_defconfig
>> b/configs/ls1021aqds_nor_lpuart_defconfig
>> index 1186af2..d8d77c2 100644
>> --- a/configs/ls1021aqds_nor_lpuart_defconfig
>> +++ b/configs/ls1021aqds_nor_lpuart_defconfig
>> @@ -2,6 +2,8 @@ CONFIG_ARM=y
>>  CONFIG_TARGET_LS1021AQDS=y
>>  CONFIG_SYS_EXTRA_OPTIONS="LPUART"
>>  # CONFIG_CMD_SETEXPR is not set
>> +CONFIG_DM=y
>> +CONFIG_DM_SERIAL=y
>>  CONFIG_NETDEVICES=y
>>  CONFIG_E1000=y
>>  CONFIG_FSL_LPUART=y
>>
>> Can you provide a formal patch and resubmit ? I have no way to test the
>> result on the board.
>
> Adding Alison, who is the maintainer of this board and could probably
> help testing the patch.

There is already a series [1] for the ls1021a-qds.

[1] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/580577/

Regards,
Bin