[U-Boot] [PATCH 00/30] dm: Add driver-model support for block drivers
Simon Glass
sjg at chromium.org
Mon Feb 29 05:19:11 CET 2016
Hi Tom,
On 15 February 2016 at 15:37, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 07:16:29PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
>
>> Recent additions of the MMC and DISK uclasses have indicated that it is time
>> to look at adding a uclass for block devices. This series does this and
>> includes a few clean-ups to the partition code also.
>>
>> A block device is typically a child device of its storage parent. For
>> example an MMC device will have a block-device child. A USB storage device
>> may have multiple block-device children, one for each LUN.
>>
>> With this series only USB storage and 'host' are converted over to use the
>> new support. Several more remain, including SCSI, IDE and MMC. Each of these
>> should get its own uclass.
>>
>> The uclass implements only a few basic features. A few tests are added to
>> check that things work as expected.
>>
>> The code size impact of switching to driver model for block devices is
>> small. One benefit is that it becomes possible to enumerate all block
>> devices, regardless of their type.
>
> Things generally make sense. I've tossed out a few Reviewed-by's for
> some things but I looked over everything. My only question is have you
> run buildman -S and compared the numbers, especially for things that
> aren't opting in yet? A few oddballs have been spotted by that already
> :)
Yes I found quite a few problems that way. There was SPL code bloat
and also general bloat with more code being linked in than before. But
I believe all of that was fixed. Let me know if you see anything
though.
Regards,
Simon
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list