[U-Boot] [PATCH 05/17] drivers: usb: musb: adopt musb backend driver to driver model

[Tom Rini]

On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 02:34:41PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 02/29/2016 02:26 PM, Mugunthan V N wrote:
> > On Monday 29 February 2016 05:34 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >> On 02/29/2016 04:44 AM, Mugunthan V N wrote:
> >>> Currently all backend driver ops uses hard coded physical
> >>> address, so to adopt the driver to DM, add device pointer to ops
> >>> call backs so that drivers that drivers can get physical
> >>> addresses from the usb driver priv/plat data.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm at ti.com>
> >>> ---
> >>
> >> [...]
> >>
> >>> @@ -704,8 +719,13 @@ static int dsps_resume(struct device *dev)
> >>>  	struct omap_musb_board_data *data = plat->board_data;
> >>>  
> >>>  	/* Start the on-chip PHY and its PLL. */
> >>> +#ifndef CONFIG_DM_USB
> >>>  	if (data->set_phy_power)
> >>>  		data->set_phy_power(1);
> >>> +#else
> >>> +	if (data->set_phy_power)
> >>> +		data->set_phy_power(data->dev, 1);
> >>
> >> Would it be possible to avoid adding this sea of ifdefs into the driver?
> >>
> > 
> > May be introducing a void pointer and pass it back in ops callback can
> > avoid ifdefs. For non DM mode, it will be holding NULL pointer and for
> > DM mode it will be holding a dev pointer. If its ok, I can fix in v2.
> 
> That looks a bit more sensible, yes. I am worried about problems with
> dereferencing the data->dev pointer though. But let's see.

Maybe looking at how Jagan has the SPI stuff separated to allow for
DM/non-DM but without a lot of ifdefs can help here too?

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20160229/bd36ed45/attachment.sig>