[U-Boot] [PATCH 7/9] rockchip: rk3188: Add pinctrl driver
Simon Glass
sjg at chromium.org
Sun Jul 17 17:49:10 CEST 2016
Hi Heiko,
On 17 July 2016 at 09:47, Heiko Stübner <heiko at sntech.de> wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> Am Sonntag, 17. Juli 2016, 08:13:51 schrieb Simon Glass:
>> On 15 July 2016 at 16:17, Heiko Stuebner <heiko at sntech.de> wrote:
>> > Add a driver which supports pin multiplexing setup for the most commonly
>> > used peripherals.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko at sntech.de>
>> > ---
>> >
>> > drivers/pinctrl/Kconfig | 9 +
>> > drivers/pinctrl/rockchip/Makefile | 1 +
>> > drivers/pinctrl/rockchip/pinctrl_rk3188.c | 614
>> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 624 insertions(+)
>> > create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/rockchip/pinctrl_rk3188.c
>>
>> Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
>>
>> But is it possible to use some common code with the rk3288 driver?
>> Things like rk3288_pinctrl_set_pins()?
>
> I don't really think that will fly.
>
> The iomux area always sees a lot of creativity when the GRF gets designed.
>
> For example on the rk3288 you have gpio0 iomux + pull + etc in the pmu and all
> other banks in the grf. On the rk3188 the iomux is contained completely in the
> grf but the pull setting of the first _12_ pins are living in the pmu - and
> even their ordering is inverted - see the whole if(flags) part in the rk3188
> pinctrl driver.
>
> The rk3399 introduces even more funny things. So I don't see where we would
> save without adding all the indirection the linux driver currently has.
That's fine, thanks for the info.
Regards,
Simon
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list