[U-Boot] [PATCH] Kconfig: Move option CONFIG_SYS_NO_FLASH to Kconfig

[Michal Simek]

On 21.7.2016 21:14, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 04:58:18PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
>> On 21.7.2016 16:46, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 01:51:20PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
>>>> Hi Tom,
>>>>
>>>> On 19.7.2016 07:12, Siva Durga Prasad Paladugu wrote:
>>>>> Move config option CONFIG_SYS_NO_FLASH as Kconfig
>>>>> option. All the boards which needs to enable this
>>>>> option can be done through defconfigs
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Siva Durga Prasad Paladugu <sivadur at xilinx.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Changes for v2:
>>>>> - No changes
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  common/Kconfig | 6 ++++++
>>>>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/common/Kconfig b/common/Kconfig
>>>>> index 8adc821..46e7173 100644
>>>>> --- a/common/Kconfig
>>>>> +++ b/common/Kconfig
>>>>> @@ -197,3 +197,9 @@ config CONSOLE_RECORD_IN_SIZE
>>>>>  	  tstc() and getc() will use this in preference to real device input.
>>>>>  	  The buffer is allocated immediately after the malloc() region is
>>>>>  	  ready.
>>>>> +
>>>>> +config SYS_NO_FLASH
>>>>> +	bool "Disable support for parallel NOR flash"
>>>>> +	default n
>>>>> +	help
>>>>> +	  This option is used to disable support for parallel NOR flash.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Do you want to take this patch to your tree?
>>>> Or should I take it to my tree with others patches which remove this
>>>> option for zynq boards?
>>>
>>> Is it blocking other changes?  If no, I'll grab it probably post -rc2
>>> and migrate all config files, if yes, um, if we can grab this now and
>>> migrate later without adding a ton of warnings, we can go that way.
>>
>>
>> There are 2 follow up patches which depends on this one.
>>
>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2016-July/260970.html
>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2016-July/260972.html
>>
>> The point here that they are removing board files for 4 boards. But if
>> you want to do it after rc2 I am fine with it.
> 
> Go ahead and bring it all in your tree (and build a bunch of arm) and if
> it looks OK there, I'll take it now.  Thanks!
> 

ok. Applied to xilinx tree.

Thanks,
Michal